Serjeant Grumbles
Active Member
- Mar 20, 2005
- 4,385
- 2,878
- 113
or they can give them medical care and make them pay out of pocket.
Ok suppose the government has no right to tell you what you can put in your body. But then you say they do have a right to tell you what you can and can't do while inebriated. But being inebriated you have less control over what you do. Then you're still letting them have control over you. Why not just let them tell you not to put that in your body in the first place.
Ok so the government is supposed to pay for your rehab. And counseling for you and all the family members you hurt. The government is supposed to pay for drug education programs to tell people drugs are bad, meanwhile saying that it's ok to take drugs legally. Why not just save money and say you can't do drugs in the first place? That's a clear message drugs are bad without being hypocritical.
While I fundamentally believe the government should have no right to regulate what we grow in our gardens or cook in our kitchens, the above statement is ridiculously socially irresponsible. What if the person "killing themselves with fun" is a mother or father? Obviously anyone "killing themselves with fun" is someone's son or daughter. Even if that means nothing to you it is a Massive waste of resources to support someone for 18 years and educate them etc, just so they can be like "lols heroine is fun" and die. That should never be ok, or some kind of right. We have a duty to our families who raised us and yes even our government as citizens to not waste our lives like that. Among countless other reasons.
Because it's not their right? It's my body, not theirs.
Again, no. Make them pay out of pocket.
Ok so the government is supposed to pay for your rehab. And counseling for you and all the family members you hurt. The government is supposed to pay for drug education programs to tell people drugs are bad, meanwhile saying that it's ok to take drugs legally. Why not just save money and say you can't do drugs in the first place? That's a clear message drugs are bad without being hypocritical.
Who is going to pay for the rehab of this new crop of irresponsible druggies? The responsible taxpayers who knew that drugs are bad in the first place and chose not to do them. How is that fair?
It's not fair to the taxpayers, the families of the users with addiction problems, society for having to deal with more addicted users....
Drug addicts are a massive burden on society and their families. I feel like people for legalization of all drugs have either
1) Never had a family member who was a drug addict and seen what that does to a family/everyone around them. Or
2) Just want this passed for selfish reasons so you have easier access to drugs for yourself without thinking about the societal repercussions.
So you've lost family members to drugs that are still illegal. Somehow I don't see how its illegality is improving the lives of junkies.
I think you have it backwards when it comes to drug dealers. Legalizing drugs would put drug cartels and their dealing subsidiaries out of business. Legitimate businesses would take over and use heavy regulations to administer drugs to people who need them for particular purposes, and without the use of violence.
Anyways, I hate this argument. It has nothing to do with whether or not drugs are good or bad for people. It's a matter of legality vs. illegality. Seems to be some heavy confusion there.
Legality is definitely not going to improve the lives of junkies. You'd make it even easier for them to get their fix. And now the government says it's ok! There's no shame in them doing the drugs they crave. The drugs that are destroying them. Now they don't have to hit rock bottom because there's all these support systems in place. They can just go on fucking up indefinitely.
So you release all the drug dealers, AND take away their livelihood. They had no problem turning to criminal activity before and they just got a get out of jail free card. Now you think they're going to turn to legitimate business?
Hard drugs are clearly bad for people. Making them easier to access means more people will be exposed to that bad. And Those that are already infected with it will be exposed to it even more easily and often.
Yeah, I believe humans should be allowed to put whatever they want in their body. Instead of using all that money to imprison people with drug addictions, use that money towards more government funded drug rehab centers.
There's just no way you can convince someone like me that legalization of all drugs will make things better. I've lost 2 family members to drugs and very nearly a 3rd. That 3rd was a heroin addict and had to do rehab twice plus interventions to get out of it. This person still talks about cravings very often. You make heroin legal, and put it up for sale in a liquor store, this person IS going to relapse. Making it easier for addicts to get their fix means they need to have even stronger willpower. That willpower is extremely hard to come by when your own body and mind is fighting you every step of the way due to addiction.
You guys want to release all of the drug dealers back into the cities, and sell drugs everywhere and somehow that's going to make society better. There's simply no way. Not in the American entitled, blame everyone else but me society we live in right now. "I can do whatever the fuck I want, let 'the man' pay for it" sounds so fucking immature.
There's not going to be Rehabs probably in the next 5,10 years. If not even sooner than that.