Live dudes: your take on low freq's ?

Most of the frequencies you 'want' from a kick these days aren't anywhere near 200Hz.
A lot of engineers use the bass / toms as the low end rumble.

I personally like my kick to be running pretty high in the mix, as soon as double bass patterns come up - they get lowered. Nothing worse than double kick over-ruling everything else.
for me the loudest things has to be the vocals though.

People don't sing the ride pattern.
 
If a sound guy puts on headphones I calmly walk up and kindly ask that he remove them. He's mixing a pa with stage bleed and room issues, not his shitty senny headphones that everyone else will be bringing lol. If they refuse, they're fired. I'm playing mostly 500 cap rooms though where stage, monitor and side fill bleed certainly play a big role in the mix.
 
If a sound guy puts on headphones I calmly walk up and kindly ask that he remove them. He's mixing a pa with stage bleed and room issues, not his shitty senny headphones that everyone else will be bringing lol. If they refuse, they're fired. I'm playing mostly 500 cap rooms though where stage, monitor and side fill bleed certainly play a big role in the mix.

You could be firing some pretty good engineers by doing that you know.....
 
They're shit for using headphones. You can tell the type, they chuck on the cans right from the get go. I've watched the worlds best mix live on regular occasion, and it never involved headphones. Sorry for making a sweeping generalization, but you get to know the type.
 
Headphones can be pretty useful for isolating vocal mic's on the verge of feeding back and other such things that can be difficult to hear with a PA blasting at you. Certainly shouldn't be actually doing the mix with them though.
 
I like the kick to be loud but not insanely bassy. So you can feel it but not to the point of distraction. It's gotta be even with the snare, there shouldn't be a huge drop in overall level when the kick isn't playing.

I find it's important to eq the low end so that the bass, guitars and kick are all sitting in different areas and where there's a boost in the kick a cut in the bass, and vice versa. Obviously it changes from gig to gig and band to band but if you're not making room down there with your EQ it is gonna be muddy, and with every room having acoustic issues chances are it's gonna be super bassy in some places in the crowd already.

The headphone thing annoys me too. I know a few engineers that use them all the time and in pursuit of a great sound in their cans, the FOH suffers. They can be handy for trouble shooting and listening out for feedback in a busy room but you shouldn't be basing your mix off them. I know plenty of bands who've noticed the headphones thing with other engineers and don't like to see their sound guys wearing them for very long.

What really bugs me about gigs is the way crowds can be in smaller places that are packed with people. Often they're so loud with chatter and talk that it can really hurt the sound. There's just no dynamic range cause everything below a certain volume gets drowned out by crowd sound, which is almost like white noise. I also notice it affects the bands onstage as they find it harder to hear the detail in their monitors and start asking for more. Sure you can try compete with the crowd level but once the gig gets too loud it's no fun for anyone. This only really happens at smaller gigs where the crowd isn't paying as much attention to the bands and talk through the sets. It's less of a problem with metal too but I do alot of other genres where it can absolutely ruin a show.
 
I'm playing mostly 500 cap rooms though where stage, monitor and side fill bleed certainly play a big role in the mix.

This exactly. It goes back to the board tape argument I got into early in the thread. I regularly mix a 1k seat hall and if the stage wedges are loud it completely changes the entire FOH mix. Likewise there is a 4 second rt60 in that room, if I throw on phones everything sounds dry as a bone and the elements sound disconnected but it's irrelevant b/c everyone is hearing it with room resonance and a ton of natural reverb. That's just a single example but every live guy has a similar story about 90% of the places they mix.
Headphones are for checking lines, cueing, looking for issues and generally troubleshooting. You can't mix on them live.
 
This exactly. It goes back to the board tape argument I got into early in the thread. I regularly mix a 1k seat hall and if the stage wedges are loud it completely changes the entire FOH mix. Likewise there is a 4 second rt60 in that room, if I throw on phones everything sounds dry as a bone and the elements sound disconnected but it's irrelevant b/c everyone is hearing it with room resonance and a ton of natural reverb. That's just a single example but every live guy has a similar story about 90% of the places they mix.
Headphones are for checking lines, cueing, looking for issues and generally troubleshooting. You can't mix on them live.

Huge+1 to the last line.

I don't check for issues on them as the issues are usually due to the room, But checking lines in setup and double checking if something has gone down is probably all I use headphones for. (This is your only hope when checking if a line has gone down during a 'big band' or orchestra, no randomly just walking on stage)

The only place I ever got into a bit of headphone mixing was when I worked for an amazing perfect treated room built for orchestra's and choirs requiring next to no sound reinforcement. Except for certain large performances and having to mic harps, pianos, solo mics for the occasional trumpet, clarinet, etc solo. My mix spot was at the back of the Theater/higher than the Small P.A so I learned to mix decently from it but the constant fear of deafening some one in the front row(seated about 3 meters from the P.a) by putting too much piano or too solo mic into the boxes taught me to depend on headphones just a little. Usually by the time the mics traveled to me at the back it sounded balanced and wonderful but obviously 30 people up the front were dying and the elderly would complain so I understand the use of headphones especially when I wasn't allowed to leave my booth to sit up front or walk around for 5. After a while I barely needed them because I started to know when something was too loud for the front crowd though.


Monitor guys should be the ONLY people allowed to wear headphones/in ears especially if they don't have a listen wedge next to them.If they are mixing in ears for someone, listen to the mix with in ears! I dislike guys who just check monitors in headphones if they have to mix FOH and Monitors. I am not afraid to walk on stage and listen to a monitor wedge if someone is having trouble. Dudes that just think "well I have put everything up so It can't be my fault" annoy me. Go and listen to exactly what the artist is hearing! Your headphones don't involve bleed or if the box is shitty itself/some other error.
(P.s I hate monitors, if only I got to mix on Big P.A's without having to deal with monitors more often)

Kick and bass should be your main low end. Too many guys let the guitar have to much low end which I feel clouds things up and gives them no separation. pull some of that shit IMO. I don't like perfectly dead toms either and enjoy some of teh b00m but this is where gates come into play,especially when running monitors from FOH.

TBH, Most FOH guys suck around here. They make sure level is coming in the channel. Turn things up...a little and there ya go. mix done. I played a decent size metal fest with Psycroptic, Blood Duster, Extortion etc(possibly thought someone decent might be mixing the show instead of just being a P.a babysitter, I was wrong) and apparently no one heard any kick drum, I had no guitar in monitors, vocals were barely there and average mixes continued for most of the day unless a band brought their own engineer. possibly heard the guy get off his ass and mix ...one good band.

end rant/ tmi?
 
The number of metal gigs (including some quite big names) i've been to where all i could hear is kick is ridiculous. I don't why it's so hard to understand that there are other frequencies than 50Hz.
 
I am a fan of large, tight bass sounds but I also spend a lot of time making sure that things aren't getting lost or muddy. But the whole thing is genre specific. The kick and bass have to sit in different places for different styles.
However, I have the displeasure of working regularly for a band leader who hates low end. He prefers everything the band plays to sound like frank sinatra i.e. Loud vocals with bass and drums buried. Even hard rock and dance music. Most of the time I wind up with bass and kick muted otherwise he complains the balance is off. It bothers the piss out of me but the client comes first.
 
oh, an interesting subject came up. I was doing sound for a befriended band on a huga gala, the sound company provided a digico d5t. but the sound for the other bands was done by a dude from the local radio station (the organized of the gala). I hang around the dude and saw that all he did was open up the channels and let stuff happen, little eq, no gates, no compression, no nothing (the resoult was a noisy, bassy, mushy mess)... wtf ?
 
It bothers the piss out of me but the client comes first.

Why is that so? If a guy comes to my studio and said "I want to record on that korean $100-worth guitar with those old-ass strings that are two years old" I'll tell him to fuck off. In a sense, that IS when client comes first. I care about his music, I care for it's quality and will do anything to capture it the best way I can. Likewise, when I'm doing FOH mixing I'm not afraid to tell guys to do stuff that is needed to be done to make my mix the best it could be, including turning down (or turning away from the crowd) their fucking amps in smaller venues, turning down unnecessary stuff in their wedges, changing settings and fucking SINGING LOUDER. In the end of the day, all of this is done so the people who bought tickets get their pleasure in full, not for artist's ego. If artist's view on good mix are dramatically different from mine, like that example with absence of kick and bass in the mix, then, well, there's a lot of soundguys around... And I'll be better off doing FOH for someone else.

PS Back on topic, blame the artist, not the soundguy. If there is a lot of over-the-top subs, then it's the fucking artist who want to feel it constantly.
 
Gotta agree that I wouldn't let the artist dictate the mix to that level. If I feel it doesn't sound good I'll let them know that and have very little problem telling someone they are too loud, their tone is too harsh/muddy or if something else is preventing them from sounding better out front or on stage.

People gotta realise that not every band is talented, knows what they are doing, has good stage/mic etiquette and KNOWS HOW THEY SHOULD BE MIXED. I've had rhythm guitarists tell me they should be louder than lead, bassists who think their amp should be the main thing heard by everyone and drummers in folk/acoustic bands laying into their kit as hard as they can and drowning out everything. While there are bad sound engineers and plenty of them. I gotta say that its as often the bands fault when sound is shit
 
Note- there are also guys with experience who DO know how they should be mixed, are talented and have amazing mic etiquette but they're rare and usually somewhat successful
 
Bah, the amount of crap FOH guys to ones that know their ass from their elbow is far and few between. Sorry for those who actually know what you are doing, but you are the minority.

What floors me is when you have a sound co. come in and the fuckhead running the show decides to sit at the bar for the whole deal. Plus he dialed in a crap mix before doing so. While this to is an extreme example, don't tell me it's the bands fault. There are just as many, if not more failures behind the board as there are behind the mics.
 
It's EXACLY the band's fault if they don't have their own soundguy. For me, thats means that they are don't giving a shit about their sound. To rely on some random dude is just stupid. You see, as an artist, it's YOUR decisions that affect the perception of your music by other people, be it the choice of label, the choice of studio to record in or the choice of your soundguy (or absence of one, in which case, I'm sorry for you). And don't tell me about money, there's always some guys around who'll do it for you for free or for very low price, just to get experience. Hell, I occasionally do free gigs just if I like music, have some free time and want to distract from studio grindings.