Is that your get-out clause in case people find a bunch of holes in your post which you can't fill?
That was in fact my get-out clause to avoid being goaded back into this "argument" (trolling attempt by the thread author, IMO) by statements like that one - however, in order to make that known I have to make at least one more post now, don't I? I'm not concerned about people picking holes in what I said (after all, you didn't manage it), since should that happen and were I intent to carry on massaging my own ego by arguing here, I could simply steamroller over them like has happened on the "metal=has fascism" side of the argument...
I won't bother tackling this, it's just another anus-bashing paragraph which can basically be summarised as "I disagree with their views and that makes me better than them".
What in fact "makes me better than them", if you're determined to translate it into those terms, is that I don't take my views and use them to create pointless, eye-wearying threads in places where I know the only outcome will be hostility and a lot of ego-wanking all round. I've seen this kind of topical explosive planted on at least 2 other metal boards by Anus followers, and I don't frequent that many.
...You made the longest post in the thread.
I'm almost certain it wasn't, but I'm not pedantic enough to want to go back through the pages and verify that trivial fact. Regardless, I tend to type a lot anyway - the basic content of that post was simple; 1) I believed the original post in this thread to be just inflammatory hot air, and that 2) Any more arguing is superfluous, since the flaws in the original "argument" had already clearly been outlined.
And PE rarely visits here
My point exactly. How often do _you_ go off to other boards and post threads guaranteed to get people hot under the collar, never to return? Is that his get out clause in case people find a bunch of holes in his post which he can't fill?
Meh, Anus gets a lot of hatred ....There's not a lot of pretense in the 'Values' section (which you probably haven't bothered to read).
I do hate anus for its self-assuredness. The self-assuredness of attempting to define what metal is, while not being very apologetic or explanatory about the fact that this is a massive, subjective, and somewhat arbitrary undertaking, or the fact that the definition they have arrived at is...questionable. Anus fans tend to back up the truths they have arrived at with a lot of what someone else called "semantic slight of hand".
What irritates me is that so many weak-minded others are so easily swayed by the confidence that anus has in its definition. I have seen label sites that copy/paste from Anus in place of providing a proper bio for a certain band, or people who casually throw out a link to the "metal faq" at Anus when attempting to explain metal to new fans of the music. The herd mentality sickens me no less for the fact that those people are trying to join what seems to them like an intellectual herd - or more likely a herd that will make them "elite". You mention detractors of anus being obnoxious, but I have hardly come across any who insult Anus at all. Incidentally I have read the values page, a very long time ago - but so what if I hadn't? I don't consider it compulsory for me to know what that site is about - their definition of metal is completely irrelevant to me, and the "hessianism" of no interest. Whatever the case, this is an argument of Like and Dislike and is fruitless.
Also, don't mix the terms "racism" and "nationalism" so easily. Someone already pointed out that nationalism can be compatible with a globalist mindset.
I personally don't think it can be said that metal and fascism are interchangable terms
I was saying that emotional expression and political orientation are not interchangeable terms. As such, the act of producing metal is not (inherently) a means of broadcasting a fascist worldview, *not even necessarily if you are a fascist*.
I don't know about AoA, but there's certainly never been a sense of egalitarianism within the circle of artistically relevant BM bands. Give me a few more examples of nihilist misanthropic BM bands that have it, though.
ALL nihilist misanthropic bands have it, simply by dint of their being nihilist and misanthropic! I was surprised, actually, to see that same point of mine echoed in a "black metal FAQ" written by an anus.com poster, a short while after posting:
http://robm.kicks-ass.net/bm.php
it is covered in section 16 "why are there misanthropic black metal bands?". However, this guy tries to cover himself and the general anus.com stand-point by creating a stark distinction between nihilist misanthropic BM and NSBM. Incidentally, I didn't find that FAQ too troublesome in that it tried to inform, as opposed to obfuscate as is what normally happens with Prozak's cronies. Some opinion was passed off as fact as always, but it was tolerable.
AoA are not a BM band (not by my reckoning anyway, although I've heard many others say different) - I picked them as an example simply because they have been said to have fascist members, despite the message of their music (not their opinions - separating politics from emotions, remember?) being egalitarian. I wont try and pass the subjective off as fact - this is opinion, as is all evaluation of music.
You said that "nobody even implied that all metal was fascist" - I believe that was implied, at one point, when talking about Black Sabbath and the values they must have held (secretly? subconsciously?) in wanting to create such music as metal at that time.
Nobody's making up their own definitions - it doesn't take a lot of brainpower to see how similar Romanticism and Fascism are, for example.
As stated, a similarity - especially a highly contested one - does not equate to a definition, and so you cannot hinge an argument on the fact that "Metal is Romantic, ergo Metal is Fascist". If you still genuinely believe in your standpoint by now, there is nothing further that can be said to dissuade you. Certainly not by someone as sick of this spurious debate as I am, by now.
...Unless you're of the belief that this scenesterism and comradery that turns metal into pop rather than defines it as metal, like I am.
Iconoclasm does not equal scenesterism or cameraderie, and I don't know where you get that from. Of course it is trendy to imagine yourself as a rebel, but that does not cheapen the act of actually being one by *avoiding* scenes and cliques. Scenesterism does turn metal into pop, I agree - which is why I'm not overly eager to associate myself with elitist BM or NSBM circles, since they're as rife with scenesters as those of any type of music you could find.
So what now? Are you going to say, "Ha ha, you made a really long post, you fell for it"? I'm done with this thread and this false argument.