metal fucking -core -core -core

True he uses little range, but he does more than anyone here has given him credit for. Listen to Ruin off of As The Palaces Burn and, while he doesn't put too much into it, it's still there. But range doesn't make a good singer. The tone of your voice, the sound as a whole makes you have a great voice. Blythe's voice is very harsh and well done, and even if it does get a wee bit old after a while, it's still good stuff. All this said, he isn't the best thing sonce Dio for sure, but he does not suck.
 
Though if you can do alot of things better than that person can do one thing then range > no range.

I of course am speaking of Daniel Gildenlow and Devin Townsend.
 
To Dodens: I know enough of what range is, to know that Randy has more than "none";).

Anyway yeah, people who say someone with a lot of range (and uses it wel) is better than someone who doesnt have a whole lot of range (but also does what they do well); even though purely subjective I dont really think so. Sometimes (for example) King Diamond can use too much range in his music and it doesn't have that solid "feel".

Anybody who knows what i'm saying, explain it better. :p
 
It is rather subjective, but quite honestly it simply comes down to the listener and if he/she actually cares whether or not the vocals have range and/or variation. Some people don't and some people do. In LOG's case, I don't find it to be a big deal (that is their style) but it wouldn't hurt to have it.

However, I think most bands benefit from having variation amongst its music, including the vocals. I think range in death metal is crucial - for example, I find a lot of 'typical' death metal vocalists (especially NY bands)make consistent use of monotonous/generic vocals making it bland and unexciting to listen to.
 
Teh Grimarse said:
king diamond is a ridiculous old faggot. he's the heavy music equivalent of broadway showtunes.

listen to something with soul you lame fucks.
king_diamond04.jpg
 
VampyrRose said:
It is rather subjective, but quite honestly it simply comes down to the listener and if he/she actually cares whether or not the vocals have range and/or variation. Some people don't and some people do. In LOG's case, I don't find it to be a big deal (that is their style) but it wouldn't hurt to have it.

However, I think most bands benefit from having variation amongst its music, including the vocals. I think range in death metal is crucial - for example, I find a lot of 'typical' death metal vocalists (especially NY bands)make consistent use of monotonous/generic vocals making it bland and unexciting to listen to.

Yeah I definetely agree with you on a lot of that. I guess I was trying to say too much variation in vocals (like anything) can ruin the music. Dani Filth is probably a good example, he tries to squeeze in as many vocal styles into a song as possible and it just doesn't sound good.