Cythraul
Active Member
- Dec 10, 2003
- 6,755
- 134
- 63
Everytime I browse the forum I see an ad for this shit: http://www.daljeets.com/591-s1.html
Who the hell wears stuff like that??!!
Who the hell wears stuff like that??!!
Some dude I know in a band was telling me about his 'rare shoes from Germany' and they looked like that, but yellow. Ghey. I wear boots from time to time but they're not lolternative they're fashionable.
Don't you think that both of these still imply "use" though? If people want something, it's useful for them.
some generality about money
Value schmalue.
I have not once seen you post anything meaningful the entire time you've been here. And even the meaningless stuff you post is subpar.
Right, but everything we've been saying is predicated on "use" being a kind of value.
zabu of nΩd;9823320 said:Cronopio's posts only function symbolically within a system of exchange
zabu of nΩd;9823320 said:Cronopio's posts only function symbolically within a system of exchange
Things that are not commodities may be useful in various ways, but that does not make them use-values. Marx defines usefulness pragmatically. I agree nothing is intrinsically useful in itself. The only indication that a thing is useful is the fact that it is actually being used by somebody. Usefulness is socially contingent; its a matter of ever-shifting human needs and desires. The discovery of. . . the manifold uses of things is the work of history. Marx offers no grounds for making a division between those uses that would be productive, natural and proper, and those that would be wasteful, artificial, and perverse.