AlexGuinness
The Collector
There is a lot about your post that really does not make sense to me, much of it may be use of the language (not sure where you are from, but my initial guess had been from the US)... some of it may be my unenlightened state.
Consider you are communicating with people that are not approaching this from your own perspective. If you re-read your post, you should see that we (at least I) will not understand.
The glaring example:
You may not care that I don't understand, but if I am representative of others here, then you would just be wasting your time if you didn't try and be clear.
I reject much of what you say, although I cannot be bothered to go back and research anything to support my theories. My life choices have been made.
You may have a point about other religions plagiarising from Christianity, although I thought they were just different interpretations of the same constrictive control structure.
I certainly do know that many of the establish festivals and dates have been "adopted" by the church, very conveniently. The Pagans come to mind.
What I do know is that The Bible should never be analysed down to the word, or taken literally. We all played Chinese Whispers as children, we all know how it works...
In a previous conversation off-forum with Kenneth I had asked him when the first recorded written version of the Bible had been. I had always believed it to be about 600AD, I cannot remember the result of his research, but it was still something like 430AD. That is a lot of distortion even before the corruption that has come in the extensive translation over the years. The translators control information. They have total power over everyone else.
By all means take the "interesting story book" as a moral guide, it has some good teachings. Why would you relinquish your own free thought though? For the record, my moral code is not dissimilar from True Christians, I just don't want my spirituality to be ruined by someone else's interpretations.
You make reference to the fact that "A wise person would choose the Bible"... Can you justify please, I do not understand? Are you using wise to indicate someone that has been through the same enlightenment as you, or are you defining wisdom in another way?
Consider you are communicating with people that are not approaching this from your own perspective. If you re-read your post, you should see that we (at least I) will not understand.
The glaring example:
Religion is lunacy, Im not talking about religion.
You may not care that I don't understand, but if I am representative of others here, then you would just be wasting your time if you didn't try and be clear.
I reject much of what you say, although I cannot be bothered to go back and research anything to support my theories. My life choices have been made.
You may have a point about other religions plagiarising from Christianity, although I thought they were just different interpretations of the same constrictive control structure.
I certainly do know that many of the establish festivals and dates have been "adopted" by the church, very conveniently. The Pagans come to mind.
What I do know is that The Bible should never be analysed down to the word, or taken literally. We all played Chinese Whispers as children, we all know how it works...
In a previous conversation off-forum with Kenneth I had asked him when the first recorded written version of the Bible had been. I had always believed it to be about 600AD, I cannot remember the result of his research, but it was still something like 430AD. That is a lot of distortion even before the corruption that has come in the extensive translation over the years. The translators control information. They have total power over everyone else.
By all means take the "interesting story book" as a moral guide, it has some good teachings. Why would you relinquish your own free thought though? For the record, my moral code is not dissimilar from True Christians, I just don't want my spirituality to be ruined by someone else's interpretations.
You make reference to the fact that "A wise person would choose the Bible"... Can you justify please, I do not understand? Are you using wise to indicate someone that has been through the same enlightenment as you, or are you defining wisdom in another way?