bangadrian said:it's a recording of a 1972 concert, genius
EDIT: actually 2 concerts compiled together, but whatev
Looking for a Job said:blues-era zeppelin blew a lot
Looking for a Job said:lol @ coda. i'm talking about lzIII and beyond. the first two albums are the only "blues era" zeppelin albums. if not, then start from houses, whatever. houses, physical graffitti, presence > I, II, IV
bangadrian said:the first 3 albums have not one single filler track among them. solid rockin' from start to finish
now, let's look at presence: "royal orleans", "candy store rock", and "hots on for nowhere" are all mediocre at best. that's nearly half the album, and even "tea for one" is questionable. really we're left with 3 solid songs that are at best, as good as any song from I through III.
presence < all other zep albums (except ITTOD)
Looking for a Job said:wtf? considering they only wrote maybe half of the first two albums, how is that not considered filler? doing only covers=filler, period. and half of lzIII is filler. "out on the tiles"? lol
Looking for a Job said:yeah, and that's why they were sued for those "totally new" songs? lol. out on the tiles=royal orleans. btw, candy store rock is pretty sweet
bangadrian said:they were sued because they didn't credit the original sources of the songs, they were listed as "page/plant"
i don't think you'll find one other led zeppelin fan who thinks that albums I, II, and III suck. you can go ahead and hate MAYH too, your loss