Zach, since you asked so nicely, I'll write a bit.
I don't agree with the Democratic party's programs, for the most part. I am one who firmly believes that too many Americans sit on their asses looking for hand-outs from the US government, and many Democratic programs are aimed to "improve" life for those less fortunate and who cannot get by on their own. I feel for those who truly cannot get by on their own; but, on the other hand, there are far too many people looking to take advantage of the programs and use the money when they are completely capable of getting by on their own (particularly through improving their education and thereby improving their standing). Democrats preach they stand for middle-class America, which I have yet to see in my years. Taxes must be raised to pay for their programs, and that includes the middle class' share of taxes.
As for Roe v. Wade, Zach, I used to be all in favor of giving a woman the choice to do with what is growing in her body as she will. Then, as I aged, I saw that abortions are, in the majority of instances, a cop out for a couple who have made a mistake. And, more often than not, it's not even a couple. Abortions provide an easy out for casual sex. If people are not willing to live with the ultimate consequence of having sex, they should not be having sex in the first place. Abortion removes accountability, and that is what has turned my opinion on abortion. And add to that stance that I've had two of my own kids - well, if you have not held your own baby right after he/she is birthed, you would not understand. Yeah, that used to be about as Democratic as I got, but that is pretty much erased as well.
As for Separation of Church and State, the President of the United States has no authority to change the Constitution. Only the Legislature can do that. Regardless of which person is elected President, I think there is a good chance Roe v. Wade will be overturned by the now Conservative Supreme Court. Even Ms. Roe has come out as an opponent of her own case outcome. If Huckabee became President, you wouldn't have to worry about the Constitution being changed in accordance with the Bible, folks. His Christian principles would, no doubt, guide many of his decisions though; and, quite frankly, our society is largely built on Christian principles as it is. I know that saddens many people and many people have a guttural dislike of Christianity, but that's where we come from. And, back to Separation of Church and State, to my knowledge the gist of it is no person is to be persecuted by the government for their choice in religion and all people are granted the freedom to choose their own religion. It does not say anything to the effect of Thou Shalt Not Practice Christianity.
Yeah, tear me apart however you wish. Those are my views though. I have a huge design review tomorrow and I must get back to my presentation.