genocide roach
DOOOOOOOOOOM
- Aug 18, 2002
- 9,421
- 16
- 38
sure, people can like a guitarist, if theyre good. worshipping mediocre crap is worthy of an insult.
~gR~
~gR~
Isn't Reinventing the Steel a best of?
sure, people can like a guitarist, if theyre good. worshipping mediocre crap is worthy of an insult.
~gR~
well, i'm an elitist, pretentious asshole. and i'm quite happy with that
and no, skill is not subjective.
~gR~
Hahahahahaha.
Yes it IS. You're silly.
As if there is a specific definition for what makes a "good" guitarist? For you to make a judgment on guitar playing ability, you are deciding on your own perception of what criteria decide someone's level of "goodness." Even as far as "technical" skill (even though 100% of people who use the world technical in music discussion are bullshitting 100% of what they say about it), what decides a technically skilled player? Is it speed, accuracy, form, melody, a combination? Is the fastest player better than other people if he is playing random notes that sound good, and is the most accurate player the best if he's playing slower, less engaging music? And, of course, it's important to note that what we percieve as being the most adept performance is coming from our own personal, unique, fallible perspective and perception.
Obviously if you have a large number of objective measures (speed, accuracy) then you can determine skill objectively to a large extent. Music, however, is not a guitar-playing contest, so while Dimebag may have won a few of those in his day it doesn't change the fact that Pantera is lowest common denominator moron metal at worst, and simple fun at best.Hahahahahaha.
Yes it IS. You're silly.
As if there is a specific definition for what makes a "good" guitarist? For you to make a judgment on guitar playing ability, you are deciding on your own perception of what criteria decide someone's level of "goodness." Even as far as "technical" skill (even though 100% of people who use the world technical in music discussion are bullshitting 100% of what they say about it), what decides a technically skilled player? Is it speed, accuracy, form, melody, a combination? Is the fastest player better than other people if he is playing random notes that sound good, and is the most accurate player the best if he's playing slower, less engaging music? And, of course, it's important to note that what we percieve as being the most adept performance is coming from our own personal, unique, fallible perspective and perception.
The great southern trendkill is the most tuned down and aggressive.