Seriously Feminists, WTF?!?!

[JeffTD]

Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

I know, right? The fact that you are completely unable to rationally interpret and respond to basic concepts presented in articles and videos is fucking maddening.

 

[ratsapprentice]

That article about urinating whilst standing....... since when does the "shake off" cause piss to go everywhere?

 

[Loren Littlejohn]

A. Raw data can't be manipulated, only interpreted correctly/incorrectly.

How it is collected can affect the outcome. For example your anti gun and need a stat for that so you say "guns kill XXXX people every year."

Omitting the fact that you included people that were beat to death with the butt of a gun or suicides instead of just homicides. Doing this of course so the number is larger than that of how many lives are saved annually because of armed citizens. :Spin:

My wife was telling me about some sort of recent study that was done over "kids with gay parents." But the criteria was actually way less stringent than that. It included "kids with parents that at any time had a homosexual relationship." So this would include straight couples that got curious and cheated on their spouses in which case of course the kid is going to be fucked up and viola you have the stats you want to prove your shitty stupid case.

 

[Loren Littlejohn]

Anyhow, back on topic. Sorries.

 

[drew_drummer]

How it is collected can affect the outcome.

Yup. It's well known that how you ask a question can affect the responses you get. But that factoid doesn't fit in with Mutant's Daily Mail schtick!

 

[Mutant]

You should know that a serious scientific paper includes a detailed description of the method used to collect data...

 

[LeSedna]

I see exactly the same shade of green on Poland as in USA.

So women are physically secure in the sea ?

 

[ratsapprentice]

Poseidon loves bitches.....