Seditious
GodSlayer
Seditious - my knowledge may be letting me down again, but that is not my understanding of socialism. It sounds more like one specific breed of it. Dictionary definitions I found are as follows:
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
sounds about right, with no private property there is nothing to buy, money has no use. Take what you need, make what you can, and it's all there for anyone who needs it to take.
as the website I linked earlier suggested, there can only be one breed of it --- global. otherwise 'a socialist state could be defenseless prey to capitalist nations' (paraphrasing). when everything is made and used freely for the benefit of those who need it, then there is no way to tax anything or loan anything and expect something back, that's just the same old capitalist wage-slavery where you're forced by the state to produce in order to consumer for survival. If the system didn't welcome that freedom from slavery it wouldn't be socialist. But of course in the socialism would there be class resentment is what I'm wondering.