maybe I dont understand something, but their present day's music is not what
I REALLY liked in Clayman or Colony.Ofcourse the last album is not Reroute to Remain(both are very cool
)--it is more "brutal" , but electronic made it .....
much melodically and more<pop(ular??).Perhaps ater RtR it's almost really metal album.I don't say anything negative about it(I like it very much, but Clayman is the best their album (my mind) and Soundtrack is differ verrrrrrry much!).I just want to say , I understand that In Flames can't stay on only one style, nowadays tendentions make music more light(although Dimmu Borgir and CoB made fine METAL albums !), however it is not the reason for such changes in selfstyle !I afraid next album's metal crash, because In Flames is still one of the best band in that present fucking dumb pop-rap world and now it can become just one of the "old the bands" !!!!maybe I really don't understand something???What is the perspective???who could answer :Smug:
respect for all true metalheads!!!!!!!
I REALLY liked in Clayman or Colony.Ofcourse the last album is not Reroute to Remain(both are very cool
)--it is more "brutal" , but electronic made it .....much melodically and more<pop(ular??).Perhaps ater RtR it's almost really metal album.I don't say anything negative about it(I like it very much, but Clayman is the best their album (my mind) and Soundtrack is differ verrrrrrry much!).I just want to say , I understand that In Flames can't stay on only one style, nowadays tendentions make music more light(although Dimmu Borgir and CoB made fine METAL albums !), however it is not the reason for such changes in selfstyle !I afraid next album's metal crash, because In Flames is still one of the best band in that present fucking dumb pop-rap world and now it can become just one of the "old the bands" !!!!maybe I really don't understand something???What is the perspective???who could answer :Smug:
respect for all true metalheads!!!!!!!
