"Be realistic: demand the impossible" is a slogan with a lot of history. For starters, it has been adopted both by anarchists, with Demanding the impossible ending up as the title of a very good book on the history of anarchism, and by Catholic activists. Having been part of both categories at some point in time, and either one or the other at most points in time, I am familiar with the concept.
Now, I am stuck between a rock and a hard place: will I be bold enough to demand the impossible, ie expect to meet a guy who is not married and will make me happy even if I KNOW, rather than just assume, that I already met my soulmate, who is married to someone else and could be mine if I just made the effort? Taking the leap of faith necessary for the first option is, by all means, right up the street of demanding the impossible.
Now I'm on a hiatus with said soulmate, largely out of my own decision. And I know that the indecision (mine) that precipitated the hiatus caused by the indecision (his) is 2/3 conscience, 1/6 fear, 1/6 sheer immaturity. Had I been more driven and active, which is something I normally am, the result would be more or less in the bag, or at least this is my understanding. But no I wasn't, I waited for him to make the big move and leave home, which was not likely given his very hesitant personality. So I basically set a booby trap for him (that was unconscious, but I am understanding now) to have a clean slate for myself, and pop went the weasel, which was the only possibility.
Now I can go back to him. I can take a plane to England and go get him. I can lure him through all manners of lies about trying to be 'just friends' so as to assuage his own guilt and fear, and the moment he's here of course things would pan out absolutely differently.
But I'm not resolved on doing that, because it still feels wrong. The problem is that substituting the One Good Match with anyone else still feels stupid.
Will I ever be able to demand the impossible?