Types of people you don't like

Types of people is kind of silly, dude. You only see snippets of everyone. But what do I know? I'm kind of a hermit. But still, it must be a fucking hassle to develop these conceptions that create so much offense. Jeez.
 
There's nothing hard to follow about this thread unless you're one of those boo boos who want everything to be an essays with Harvard references and cursive writing.
 
Is this JAGEs manifesto? Can we be liable for neglect when the massacre happens?
 
There's nothing hard to follow about this thread unless you're one of those boo boos who want everything to be an essays with Harvard references and cursive writing.

You mean discussions between Dak and Ein? Yes, I prefer those, as they don't make me feel dumber by reading them.
 
Pop science faggots. Nothing wrong with having just a casual interest or whatever, but the kinds of people that post macros of "Like, omg, our universe is so big :O" and Neil deGrasse Tyson quotes all the time to foster an image of being intellectual without actually really trying to understand anything are useless. These types pop up in lecture a lot too; often they are outwardly nerdy and unattractive which I suppose they realize and therefore feel a need to adapt an intelligent persona, but they always fall flat on their smug faces. Like going to any basic physics/physical chemistry class, they're the kind that will ask the professor "Durrrr, don't you need to factor in relativity?" when discussing a baseball traveling at 30 m/s. Or go to an ochem lecture, and the only term they ever learned was "steric hindrance", which they will try to use to explain every fucking mechanism discussed. If there's a break in the middle of lab long enough to get a coffee, you can bet that they're the kind to wear their lab coats to Starbucks. Total fucking posers. These types will often debate creationists on internet forums because that's about all they can take on, and even then their form of debate is usually shallow on based on elementary school platitudes on par with "Knowledge is power!!!".

But I guess that applies to anyone that I see as pretentious without the know-how to justify it. If I were a music theorist or a student of history or anything else, I'm sure I would hate many of my falseposing peers just as much.
 
Well, posing on a superficial knowledge base is merely a symptom of a problem which can evidence even at deeper levels of regurgitation, and this is the problem of input/output with no filtering or processing.

“Most people do not accumulate a body of experience. Most people go through life undergoing a series of happenings, which pass through their systems undigested. Happenings become experiences when they are digested, when they are related to general patterns, and synthesized.” ~ Alinsky
 
Tumbler Feminists. I fucking despise these people and wish that they would either die from an 8 foot dildo shoved up their ass, or fucked by me until they scream "privilege."
 
Hippies. All of them but especially upper-middle class designer hippies who 'took a year off from studies' about six years ago and now survive on hand-outs from mummy and daddy and/or their grandparent's inheritance which they spend on drugs, designer hippie ragwear and professional dreadlock maintenance.
 
Hippies. All of them but especially upper-middle class designer hippies who 'took a year off from studies' about six years ago and now survive on hand-outs from mummy and daddy and/or their grandparent's inheritance which they spend on drugs, designer hippie ragwear and professional dreadlock maintenance.

lol, I have an aunt that is kind of a more respectable version of this. Ex-hippie and "independent woman" with several different degrees, cannot stick to anything for a long time, has wanted to divorce my uncle but doesn't because he has all the $$$$$$$$. I don't dislike her though, she's definitely intelligent and not self-destructive (ignoring all the accidents she's been with her many expensive vehicles due to her day-dreamy personality), but a complete idealist and unrealistic snob.
 
20090327_bankers_560x375.jpg


WallStreetGreed.jpg


sillypoorpeoplehelpfisfornabjmnsks.jpg


tumblr_m044rsJ9mh1qjc351o1_500.jpg


Banksters, CEO's, speculators and their willing whores in politics and the media.

market.png
 
Pop science faggots. Nothing wrong with having just a casual interest or whatever, but the kinds of people that post macros of "Like, omg, our universe is so big :O" and Neil deGrasse Tyson quotes all the time to foster an image of being intellectual without actually really trying to understand anything are useless.


These people don't usually read popular science.

They're not even true pop science faggots.
 
It annoys me when people treat science like Creationists treat the Bible. They'll use phrases like "scientific fact" and act like science is some kind of impersonal sentient machine that observes all objectively and spits out truth. The people that put forth that crap tend to get mad when it's pointed out that scientists are people and science is limited not just by human intelligence, but by our technology. We don't understand most of the mass in the universe, but apparently we've figured it all out, apparently. Just because something wasn't put in a lab, it doesn't exist.

And it's also annoying when people make stupid judgments about people. I'll see someone observe someone do one thing and say, "they're x." Really? A human lives way longer than a few seconds. How does anyone give such a sweeping judgment so fast and not feel silly?