I was actually hoping all of you artards who got to pick players from JLM's roster before me would pass on Brees. I was just going to trade him for some nice players.
This is just my opinion, so if you want to settle for lesesr players that's totally up to you Ack, but Brees is a premium player in this league. He has the capability of scoring 70+ a week if their offense starts clicking, which it should. So he's worth a pretty penny imo.
Now, if you decided not to be a dick about it like I wouldn't, you could probably get a WR1 and a RB2 (or vice versa) for him and I'd say that's fair.
I probably just raised the stakes on everyone slobbering overing Brees. For that I am not sorry.
On a side note however, I'm glad to see there is a lot of activity this year in fantasy, and it's only week one and a half. This is going to be a fun league.
edit: @Ack: The problem I see with your receivers is the lack of consistency you're going to get from them on a weekly basis. Consistency rules fantasy football. This is why I always shy away from boom or bust players, especially those who are coming off of career high season (ala Tom Brady in 2008, Shaun Alexander in 2006, Braylon Edwards in 2008, etc), and never jump on a prospect who could be lights out or be a complete dud (Shonn Greene - so far). You need guys who are basically guaranteed at least 4-5 catches and a 1/2 touchdown a week. This way, you may get beat one week because some dude decides to draft Peyton Manning in the first round and Peyton assrapes you with a 116 point week, or Arian Foster decides to annihilate my Colts because he's a major dick, but over the course of the season you get consistent production from these guys keeping you at the top of the seeding chart and hopefully leading you to a championship. You need to find people who are as close to a "sure thing" as possible. This has been my philosophy for years and something I've explained to Ozz before, you need guaranteed points.
Hopefully that helps you with your decisions.