vuashke must go

[Lothlorien]

thanks for pointing that out.... but wtf are you all "Sigh"-ing about? Any time Mike feels someone needs to get the boot, he'll contact me about it and that one just hasn't gotten to me yet.

i thought u saw the post from mikael but still "saw no reason to ban him." but it looks like the problem has been solved.

 

[woodsmoke]

Good riddance.

.

 

[Hedon-]

wow i cant believe mike actually got vuashke banned

 

[BlueSky]

I really do hope Vuashke is stable enough to handle the blow though.

 

[Holocaust on the Moon]

Now that Nathan_lol is back, vuashke doesn't seem that bad.

 

[Annihilat0r]

wow i cant believe mike actually got vuashke banned

haha, indeed.

he's going to return anyway, but I think the loss of 1.000 posts will have a lasting impact on his personality.

 

[woodsmoke]

wow i cant believe mike actually got vuashke banned

This wasn't the first user Mikael banned. Anyone remember oinkness?

 

[Annihilat0r]

The one that said all of Mike's solos sounded the same?

 

[SerenityNow!]

I'll take LOL over Vuashke. You know something, even though he's been banned, people will still talk about him DAILY. I'm beginning to think he accomplished something here. Fuck him!

Please, somebody, close this thread, NOW!!

 

[woodsmoke]

No. I believe he was the one who claimed Mikael looked like a pedophile in regards to an older pic of him.

 

[BlueSky]

I'll take LOL over Vuashke. You know something, even though he's been banned, people will still talk about him DAILY. I'm beginning to think he accomplished something here. Fuck him!

Please, somebody, close this thread, NOW!!

Agreed, let this thread return to the nothingness it came from. Much better threads have been deleted than this one let me tell you.

 

[demon of the moor]

Vuashke = Troll

 

[NicholasDWolfwood]

Vuashke = Troll

good thinking there. how long did it take for you to figure that out?

 

[Kenneth R.]

if I don't give a fuck wins, I suggest we ban this complaint from ever reappearing.

 

[Twelveby5]

Did you guys know that some wanks are burning chvrches here in India?

 

[baarg]

Am I mistaken? Cos I've seen posts by Mike before and his name is actually Mikael Åkerfeldt not Mikael Akerfeldt, also the joining date is all wrong, as Mike's joining date is about 2001 when this forum was created. That guy is not Mike, I am sure.

 

[in_my_time_of_disease]

^Read the post I commented you in the Cliff thread.

 

[baarg]

Yea, read it, replied, blushed and so on!!!!

 

[Twelveby5]

you mean like this?

 

[CadenZ]

he's going to return anyway, but I think the loss of 1.000 posts will have a lasting impact on his personality.

...and someone said "Hope he is stable enough to handle the blow"

What blow? Being banned from an internet forum? Losing posts will have an impact on his personality? OMG that's like, you know, these things combined, is like, the end of the world, or smthn!!1uno </sarcasm>

Sorry, but I just don't see how it's a big thing for anyone to get banned from a forum

I do agree that it's easier (and probably more pleasant) to visit these forums without having to read his often offensive, negative and naive remarks, but I do think it's good to have someone state their opinion when it's different from others'. Often his posts made me think "Is it really so? Am I wrong here?", and though I didn't change my opinion or agree with him much often, just to think about and re-value one's own opinions makes them stronger and evolves them. So I was hesitant to put him on the ignore list...but fortunately Mike solved the situation :zombie: