Tongue_Ring said:
not really moreso than non-fiction
most of "classic" non-fiction is really truly completely unreadable to a random guy of the street, so saying that non-fiction is better than fiction is unmistakeably elitist
what i meant by "classic nonfiction" was "Mein Kamf" and books catogorized as "philosophy"/books written by people refered to as "Philosophers"
most of that is completely unreadable for a random guy off the street, that's why i read the superhero genre, they're able to illustrate social messages in a way that a random guy off the street can understand, and i don't wanna hear any of this crap about superheros being for kids either
the X-men was all about the civil rights movement, the mutants were representative of black people,
proffessor Charles Xavier was representative of
doctor Martin Luther King, Magneto trying to have the mutants rule over the humans was representative of Malcolm X's goal of having the blacks take rule the whites, the only difference was that Magneto's goal was actually feasable
DC's "Superman" was originally a dipiction of an actualized specimen of Nietzche's "Superman"
the fantastic four were representative of the four elements of the human psyche
Spiderman was altruistic to the point of psychosis/personal detriment from day 1, the mantra "with great power comes great responsibility" was in Amazing Fantasy #15
Batman/Punisher have no superpowers, they've become psychotic from post-trumatic stress disorder and Batman was originally just the most popular of a huge group of hero types with out any superpowers, the Phantom, the Spirit, the Shadow, the Rocketteer etc etc etc, and these were just illustrated versions of the "pulp" novels from before the great depression
i could go on and on, but i think i made my point