We were all knew guys once, wanting to get to know the regs, and because the regs were willing to take the time to talk to me on MSN, and answer my questions and offer advice on the forum, i now feel like a part of this community, and I'd say it's only fair we offer that same courtesy to the NEW new guys (i've only been here a year so I'm as good as a new guy, but meh)
I agree. Like it or not, some of us are going to stick around for a long time. We are the future of this place. It is in every member's best interest to let us in. You don't have to go out of your way or anything, just don't scare us off. You think this place is stagnant now? Just wait and see what happens when registrations dip too low for a few months. Some members that were just getting into it will probably leave, and older members will be less active. As old member's interest in the community dwindles, new members are less inclined to stick around. These events start a positive feedback loop. The longer the period of stagnation, the harder it gets to recover. Eventually everything just snowballs.
The worst thing you can do at this point is cause drama. Drama destroys forums, especially ones that are entering a transition phase. I haven't seen too much drama yet, but this thread is a bit more dramatic than what I recognize as the norm for this forum. You guys seem like a pretty mature bunch though. If this drama, then it's extraordinarily reserved drama. I can see it potentially getting worse though. It's something to monitor.
Adding more subforums is only gonna increase this void that's causing so much ballache.
This has been my experience. Adding more sub-forums isn't going to make new members want to post more, isn't going to make navigating the forums easier, and will only segregate groups of members from each other.
Adding too many sub-forums promotes elitism by group isolation. A respected member in one sub-forum can't get a word in on another. It can get to the point where it starts seeming less like a single community and more like a several rivaling neighbor communities. It also leaves more that has to be distinguished, which is great when your member base is mostly dealing with several very specific and fundamentally-differing topic ranges... but as someone already said, most posters don't know what they're looking for when they log in. A wall of sub-forums is often confusing and disorienting, even to members who can navigate them. It's easier for posters to find a topic that captures his or her interest when there are fewer, more generalized sub-forums. I think that it's better to have a few generalized sub-forums that cover everything by generic implication than it is to have a bunch of specialized sub-forums that cover everything by specific indication. Inclusive is good, exclusive is bad.
Organizing the existing sub-forums in a more intuitive manner sounds like a good compromise right now.
I'm not just talking out of my ass here. I've seen this shit go down time after time after time. Individual members are difficult to predict and the new member base is always a toss up(as it always should be), but groups of members are very predictable. I'm no expert by any means. I'm just sharing what I have learned from my experiences with message boards. I like this place, and I don't want to see it go to shit.