Why Star Wars Dominates All

Thats cause of the way it was portrayed on screen. Read the books, they are much more in depth and there are many more scenes then in the movies. it makes perfect sense in the books. George just has no vision when it comes to putting things on screen. Honestly if you look at his other work...

Raiders of the Lost Ark
Willow
American Graffiti

He really does a great job of creating the characters and explaining the backstory behind them. He just doesn't understand how to make those characters work on screen. its not his fault, not everyone is cut out to be a director.
 
Dude, I shouldn't have to read the books. The movie should BE the big picture with the books filling in the behind-the-scenes details. The sad fact is that most of the movies are ham-fisted portrayals of pretty simplistic fairy-tale stories with mostly pretty lousy acting and characterization. The books were probably written by people frustrated about how vacuous the actual movies were.
 
They came out before the movies and were written by quality authors and Lucas ;)

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode-Phantom-Menace/dp/0345427653[/ame]

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Clone-Wars-Star/dp/034550898X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293562269&sr=1-1[/ame]

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode-III-Revenge/dp/0345428838/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293562254&sr=1-1[/ame]
 
Still, it shouldn't be necessary. I don't have to read The Silence Of The Lambs in order to make the movie great, because the movie IS great thanks to the actors, screenplay and direction. The book adds lots more details to the plot (from what I recall, I read part of it over 15 years ago) but their loss isn't felt thanks to the way the story is handled.

I grew up with Star Wars, I loved those movies as a kid (A New Hope came out the year before I was born) but looking back I have to admit to the major flaws that would see them justifiably torn to shreds nowadays.

A New Hope:
Hamill & Fisher's acting in this movie was goddamn awful, plain and simple. And the character of Darth Vader kinda proved just what happens when you take the voice of a charismatic actor (James Earl Jones), seperate it from his own body language and pair it up with a non-actor in a mask who just happens to be tall (David Prowse). Harrison Ford probably saved the movie as he was at least vaguely convincing in his role. Alec Guinness was good but I'd expect nothing else from someone of his experience and he probably wasn't trying very hard (he made no secret of how much he disliked the role). Sad to say but some of the best performances in this movie were shown by largely peripheral character (Peter Cushing as an example). For the time though the special effects were spectacular and combined with the fantasy storyline this is probably what saved it.

The Empire Strikes Back:
The lead actors started hitting their stride in this one, and coupled with the better screenplay and direction added up to a much better movie

Return Of The Jedi:
Lucas is driven insane by the merchandise revenues and starts thinking of ways to make even more characters that can be molded in plastic, the rest is history.

In a recent interview with Harrison Ford he stated that he didn't think the character of Han Solo really added up to much and he thought it would have given ROTJ more emotional weight if he had died. When asked why he thought that didn't happen he replied "George didn't think 'dead Han' toys would sell very well". :D
 
81242032.jpg

this is awesome!


this is beyond awesome!!!
oh god!!!
 
I always get weird looks when I tell people I have never watched any of the original 3 star wars movies. I have watched all the prequel ones. And they are terrible, other than the yoda vs sith fight. The dialogue and acting is exactly like the acting and dialogue in a porn film. Just terrible. With annoying characters and a boring story to go with it. Natalie Portman is the only good thing about those films.