Yes, bush is a tard but please don't vote democratic...

Historically, economies IMPROVE during time of war. And there was a huge surge in consumerism. Remember that whole "BUY AMERICAN PRODUCTS!" deal?

Bill Clinton spent time defending himself from accusations that had NOTHING to do with his presidential record and everything to do with the Republican party's spite at losing the White House. He wasted valuable time going on trial for something that was not a crime, while conservative pundits assaulted him from all sides with baseless idiocy like the "Nationwide Clinton Murder Ring" or whatever Ann Coulter was babbling about; now these same pundits scream "TREASON!" at anybody who dares to criticize George W. Bush's actions as a president. Hypocrisy at its finest.

The stock market is improving, but it's still nowhere near where it was during the Clinton years...and judging solely on the stock market false economics, anyway. The REAL problem is jobs. Unemployment has soared under Bush; I repeat once again: BUSH WILL BE THE FIRST PRESIDENT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION TO PRESIDE OVER JOB LOSSES.

Stocks are making money because corporations are making money; therefore, the rich benefit (and benefit more from Bush's one-sided tax cuts). And don't pull that voodoo economics "trickle-down" card; it didn't work with Reagan and it won't work now. The rich don't spend their extra money improving the American economy; they invest more and spend overseas.

Jobs are going overseas too. The reason there's job losses is because Bush is urging American corporations to outsource jobs to India and Japan. American jobs are being sacrificed for the profit of the companies, who can pay a guy in Pakistan ten bucks an hour to do what an American would demand fifty for.

A Nobel Prize winner for economics called Bush's economic plan "the worst in American history." That oughta tell you something.
 
During the last year of the Clinton administration is when massive layoffs started.

Re-write history however you like to see it, but that's just the truth.

Jobs have been going overseas for decades, but that's Bush's fault? :lol: Truly a pathetic argument there....

9/11 nearly killed the airline industry and hurt our economy even more.

Then all this corporate scandal hurt the stock market too.

Think Bush is the only one who had his hands in Enron's pocketbook? So did Slick Willie, and for that matter Gray Davis, who rightfully got kicked out of office for LYING about our deficiet, and spending his happy ways overpaying for energy contracts because companies like Enron had him paid off and was nothing more than a puppet.

I see the economy picking up locally, I think that's a good thing, but of course, you hate it since a liberal is not in office. :lol:

Just because those are your opinions doesn't make it true.

2 years after the tax cuts, the economy improves. A very notable Democrat, JFK realized this, So did Reagan, and now Bush. why can't you? You liberals are great at pointing the finger, but horrible for accepting part of the blame. California is in the shits because of Gray Davis.

Oh, and if Clinton had done his job properly, the Iraq war you hate so much would never have happened, nor would have 9/11.

But of course, you can't see any fault in the Left, can you? Much like a religious bible freak, your one sided faith-based views don't take the whole picture into account.
 
where to start? first, maybe by having a civil debate here and not slamming people just because they have a different perspective?:)

Saddam was a creation, largely, of the CIA and a real bosom buddy of the reagan administration.

here's Rumsfeld with his good buddy Saddy:
handshake300.jpg


Bush and his neocon crew sent us to war under false pretenses. Remember those photos that we were assured were weapons of mass destruction? They've turned out to be nothing of the kind. Remember the drone planes which were supposed to be able to attack the US? Turns out they can't fly over a few hours. We all know Saddam did have gas weapons, because he used them against the kurds - over a decade ago...but by all we know now, his plan for nukes seems to have been just a dream, and not a single gas weapon has been found, indicating that that weapons system had also been dismantled and destroyed.

Our deficit is the worst it has ever been. If Reagan could think nowadays, he'd be turning over in his near grave. More and more fiscal conservatives are really getting aggravated about this; its supposed to be the democrats who are spend crazy but Bush leads the pack, with the Republican controlled Congress.

Bush has spent more days vacationing than any president ever. Does that sound like a leader who is vigorously concerned about leading the country against terror? And by the way, they like to describe his "ranch" as such because it sounds good and texas macho, but in reality, to be a ranch, its gotta have cattle, and there are none at the ole Bush hacienda.

Bush got into yale with the most mediocre grades possible. during vietnam his dad's buddies vaulted him over a waiting list of hundreds of national guard wannabees to get him into pilot training, which by the way, his score for flight training was as low as it could be to allow him into the program.

his record as a business man is so poor but his dad's buds continuously bailed him out of one fiasco after another.
http://uggabugga.blogspot.com/2003_09_21_uggabugga_archive.html#106449000607397949

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Kerry or Gore or frosty the snowman would be better or worse; that's purely hypothetical, and completely tainted by our outlooks. and yes, the two parties are so inherently stupid that I'm a registered independent. But I want something more than mediocrity in the presidency.

oh and then there's this:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/essayaninterestingday.html
Bush deciding a photo op with little black kids in school was more important than immediately responding to the 9-11 crisis.
Here http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/bush-911.htm is the video of the event. you can see bush clearly being told what was happening but hey, why let national disaster interfere with a chance to show how concerned you are about education.
 
Black Winter Day said:
is this warrell??? :p

"everyone gets richer under capitalism" - it usually when i hear a statement this dumb from another viewpoint that i leave the conversation. which i am. unless you are warrell. or maybe jim.

No, I am not Warrell so you can go ahead leave the conversation.

xenophobe said:
There has never been enough public support of the Libertarian party for me to actually consider wasting my vote for one of them, sadly.

*wants to keep my guns, and my money* :loco:

it is true that they are still far to small but you still have nothing to gain by voting for Bush because he will likly raise taxes just like Regan did, because he is over spending, just like Regan did. History has a funny way of repeating itself doesn't it?

Once Bush's tax cuts are reversed he will be just like Kerry...

I'm not going to pretend that libertarians can win but at least you aren’t giving an endorsement to one of those fascist/socialist assholes.
 
Socialism is very possible, and often times more beneficial to the citizens. Look at Canada.
 
Wolftribe said:
hmmm i think its funny that you say "facist/socialist"... seeing as in theory, fascism and socialism are quite different

They are diffrent but they do not contratict eachother.

Facist is a social term. Think of all the cencership that is being pushed right now.

Socialist is an economic term. Think of all the new government programs that keep blowing up...

The Germans and the Italians during WWII were mostly socialist and also facist at the same time.
 
NoLordy Capone said:
Socialism is very possible, and often times more beneficial to the citizens. Look at Canada.

I can think of some Canadians that I know that would not agree.

Their healthcare program is a disaster. Waiting lists are horrible and the quality of coverage is abysmal.

On top of that the USA has higher growthrates and lower unemployment than any socialist contrey you could name EVEN THOUGH WE ARE STILL JUST RECOVERING FROM A RECESSION THAT YOU SOCIALIST LOVE TO BITCH ABOUT!
 
You and xenophobe are as bad as the christians. So eager to try to convert, and so willing to damn those who don't agree. You can both fuck off.
 
NoLordy Capone said:
You and xenophobe are as bad as the christians. So eager to try to convert, and so willing to damn those who don't agree. You can both fuck off.

INDEED.

Bush is just killing the economy and our civil rights. Anything that gets him out of office (Kerry) is good.
 
Never said who I'm voting for. :D So xeno really can't try to explain why my choice is bad.
 
This really is none of your business or mine, but i'll vote anyone to get Bush out of Office... i'd vote a transexual hooker into office over him
 
xenophobe said:
Ummm... what drugs are you on? :err:

The recession was coming on strong during the last year of the Clinton Administration. Bush inherited it. THEN 9/11 happened, which was a huge shock to our economy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56170-2004Feb19.html

"...the National Bureau of Economic Research, which dates business cycles, has said the recession lasted eight months beginning in March 2001 -- two months after Bush's inauguration."

opinion, but still worthwhile: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4264572/

bush attempts to "create" manufacturing jobs by trying to label mcdonald's type jobs as manufacturing: http://www.pressherald.com/business/stories/040229fastfood.shtml i love it. just change the name of something and all the statistics start looking good. the bush administration is really good at naming things. "the healthy forest initiative," "clear skies initiative," those are awesome names for things designed to do the opposite.

i kind of like how things are falling apart under bush. i hope he gets reelected. another war somewhere killing brown people, him saying nookeeler, more tax increases for the middle class (yes bush increased taxes [''between 2003 and 2012 the bush tax cuts will force an increase of $560 billion in taxes to be paid under the alternative minimum tax" --see 'perfectly legal' by david kay johnston]), and more liberals complaining. i love it when liberals complain.