me neither, the "magic" won't work this time around
the drummer is haphazard, untight and ill fitting
i don't think he does anything interesting on the whole record -- when he plays blasts it's just straight up the same thing all the time without even cymbal accents, never mind any fills??? when he plays slower things he seems inconsistent and insecure. but this is not the problem.
also the folks who said the guitar is sometimes mistuned/poorly intonated were right. i love vlad tepes, so i don't really care, although it is surprising coming from agalloch considering the dedication to perfection that was evident on "the mantle". but that's not the problem either.
i'll reserve judgement re: what the actual problem is until i've listened to the album twenty more times or so (i copied it from a friend who had downloaded it, even though i said i wouldn't -- in my defense, i was somewhat drunk, if that defense still holds)
maybe it is that the album doesn't seem to know what it wants to be: is it a back-to-the-roots affair, a pale folklore throwback? because the solos are back, and the 3rd interval riffs, and the intro to "ghosts..." sounds like a continuation of "the melancholy spirit", and it is certainly steeped in wintery blackness.
but wait! is it really actually just a logical progression from "ashes..."? because that's what "the watcher's monolith" sounds like. this is the closest thing i've ever heard to "generic agalloch" in that the various parts almost all sound like they are modified versions of ideas from previous songs -- and the overall impression is that of a less fiery version of "ashes..."
or! are we being progressive and breaking new ground, with post rock-esque soundscapes populated by cellos and moogs? (i love the cello things in "to drown", that is class A experimentation)
there's nothing inherently wrong with having many disparate ideas on a single record, but this time around it feels confused and less unified than previous albums, i guess?
above all, though, it's that intangible thing -- as i said, i'm not FEELING it. it's like that new burzum -- you can't really fault it as such, but it's just not "hvis lyset tar oss" and never could have been. i think i wrote a review of "ashes..." where i called it sober as opposed to a drunk "pale folklore", and keeping with that, this album is even more sober. more of a rock band, less of an otherworldly thing. i don't know.