S<issors
wins.
- Jan 16, 2007
- 1,809
- 2
- 36
BTW, I am an independant and would have voted Ron Paul had he stayed in the race. In case anyone is curious of whatever political balls I lick.
Aaaaand your argument suddenly loses all integrity
BTW, I am an independant and would have voted Ron Paul had he stayed in the race. In case anyone is curious of whatever political balls I lick.
The neocons will never be happy..because they still watch reruns of 'Leave it to Beaver". I'm glad conservatism is almost dead in America
Of course it would. In general, black people not liking white people do so from a reasonable position: they were enslaved by them for hundreds of years and continued to face discrimination thereafter. Hell, this sort of thing isn't even that 'ancient' if you look at how they were treated during Catrina, for instance.
This same justification cannot be transposed to the white population, ever (not that it isn't abused in many cases by the 'victims').
Hopefully all of this is painfully obvious to you, but after reading your initial comment I seem to think it may not be.
The neocons will never be happy..because they still watch reruns of 'Leave it to Beaver". I'm glad conservatism is almost dead in America
Florida is not exactly full to the brim of noble civil rights leaders. When it comes to race issues, it's full of redneck racists and gangsta-thug type racists. Whites and blacks respectively. The latter group for the most part are laughably displaced from any original idea of the whys and hows of equal rights and only serve to self-segregate themselves in everything they do, and their numbers are enormous. Is *that particular thing* better? It doesn't seem so to me. But keep spinning it if you like.
You think? It's not like they didn't cite things. I might agree that bringing up the founders is pretty irrelevant to our current situation. And the article doesn't even make the best arguments possible, but nothing about it was false, per se.That's really obnoxious.
You think? It's not like they didn't cite things. I might agree that bringing up the founders is pretty irrelevant to our current situation. And the article doesn't even make the best arguments possible, but nothing about it was false, per se.
Hell, this sort of thing isn't even that 'ancient' if you look at how they were treated during Catrina, for instance.
This was just after Bush won again after marshaling all the self righteous rednecks to vote for him. It's understandable that the author would be pissed.I wouldn't really want to get into whether any of this person's claims are false or not. That's not why I found it obnoxious anyway. I just don't like the tone of it. Every other word is 'fuck' or 'fucking'. He/she sounds like some annoying kike throwing a tantrum. It's the kind of thing only campus liberal types enjoy reading...while they pat each other on the back and simultaneously jerk each other off.
Way to completely miss the point.
I honestly have no idea why you're taking it entirely the wrong way.