Prozactrooper said:I think your all stupid as hell for getting a band tat. I'm with the other bloke. I'm going to get a tat but its not going to have anything to do with a band or anything at all. Also I've put a 5 year limit on the tat. If I still want this design after 5 years I'll get it. If not, I won't.
This is just my opinion and I've very fussy about what I like in the realm of tattoos. I'm also only going to get one tat and its going to be rather large, smack bang in the middle of my back. I think tatts should be incorperated into the body, not just a picture on the skin. Gezz, I bet if Opeth signed your arms you'd get that tatooed aswell.
Misticdeth said:Well, to me the Opeth logo is not just about the band. I love the design, thats why i got it. Plus its not as if we got Opeth tatooed on our arm. You go up to someone who never heard Opeth before and will just think the its a really cool design. Thats what it is to me, just a cool design. Even 30 years down the line i wont think of it as Opeth but just as a beautiful design. Thats my 2 cents.
Prozactrooper said:I know what you mean, and I know how rude I was but its just something that I feel is stupid. The Opeth 'O' isn't as bad as other things I've seen done, but still its going to always be linked to the band. If it was your own bands logo that would be different story, as it was something that your creative energy went into. Hell, if my bands logo wasn't so ugly I'd get it put across my back...
jester00 said:hey misticdeth lets see a pic of the tatoo!
Misticdeth said:They couldnt lay their eyes off that beutiful piece of art.
Dvoters said:Im getting the O in between my shoulder blades or on my upper calf next month, with some text from an Opeth lyric.
\m/