metalkingdom said:
You know, I almost deleted my last post and apologized to you guys for being so hostile. Then I remembered the stupid racial shit that frequents these boards, the disrespect shown towards metal legends and heroes, and this post ^^^^. So, fuck that.
You know, I used to be just like you when I was junior high. I used to get really angry at kids who did anything to do with 3rd Reich Germany, or just blatant disrespect to people who are deserving (such as allied soldiers in the second world war, persecuted jews who had unjustly suffered, etc.), but I've discovered that iconoclasm to be probably the worst way to destroy an idea, however it's the best way to preserve a symbol which should remain powerful (think of the Byzantine iconoclastic controveries for another example). Therefore, by forcefully eradicating the symbols of the past, while they still remain in common memory, keeps the symbols at a potency at which they had held at the time they were destroyed, and therefore when they are brought up, they remain as powerful as ever.
Just because it makes sense in the context, Dimebag Darrell can be seen as a symbol, and by him being murdered, he himself as a symbol has been intensified because of his loss. Thusly people will be more apt to remember him as this (intensified) symbol stood for (musical talent, rock and roll, the rock and roll lifestyle) than for a realistic vision of what he actually was.
Furthermore, after he, as a living person, has been destroyed as a symbol, that particular living symbol is dead, however he can live on as a fixed symbol in produced images, which can possibly result in idolatry of them/him and that symbol for which he stood for.
...but humans are like that, they tend to be idealists to an irrational level and they like symbolic representation of their ideals. It's pretty much unavoidable.
You'll probably just disagree with me (partly on incomprehension of what I'm trying to say, and partly because of belligerence would be my guesses if you do) but hey, flame on!