The Dude
The Dude abides
NeverIsForever said:You're absolutely right. I mean, god forbid "music" be "musical" in any way, when simply making noise is obviously a more valid art form.
That is arguable.
NeverIsForever said:You're absolutely right. I mean, god forbid "music" be "musical" in any way, when simply making noise is obviously a more valid art form.
So if I go out and bang on a trash can lid for ten minutes, the artistic value of my so-called music is on a par with music that actually took time, talent, and technical prowess to play? I think notThe Dude said:That is arguable.
NeverIsForever said:So if I go out and bang on a trash can lid for ten minutes, the artistic value of my so-called music is on a par with music that actually took time, talent, and technical prowess to play? I think not
The Dude said:I have seen rave reviews for the exact kind of banging you have just described. Therefore it is arguable.
"Artistic value" is not quantifiable, I think that's my point.
Silent Song said:what's wrong with Vapor Trails?
Justin S. said:There are people who believe lots of ridiculous things. That an opinion exists certainly doesnt imply validity. While it may not be quantifiable, one can certainly make a qualitative argument based on many things including expertise, (OMFG!!111) reason, and fundamental human responses.
Botfly said:That's just your opinion. I simply disagree.
Devy_Metal said:emperor's production on anthems is nothing short of genius
Moonlapse said:All that, and I bet he didn't even have to get out the thesaurus once.
Moonlapse said:Okay so we've run through the extreme contrast of someone banging on a trashcan juxtaposed with Schubert. So what happens when you run into a situation where it's Emperor vs Opeth, Satriani vs Vai etc.
I think there's a certain level of similarity that's reached by peers in professional music where we become less able to gauge 'artistic credibility' in any objective sense (using technique, communicative ability, depth etc. as benchmarks, as noted by Justin). It becomes more an issue of personal prefference.
Moonlapse said:As an example: To some people, minimalism communicates much more than multi-tonality, frequent progression etc. Same applies vice versa.
Moonlapse said:I think those 'objective' grading points only apply to a degree, and after a certain point almost become void when dealing with musical peers. Unless we were able to break down, analyze and ultimately understand the mental chemical processes that led to the fruition of two similar, albeit individual pieces of work, we wouldn't get very far in terms of quantifiably citing superiority.
Justin S. said:Ive seen this come up now several times, and I simply dont see why. None of the language I use is overblown or anything but ordinary. For the record, ive never used a thesaurus for forum purposes. The structure might get a little dense, but thats just a by-product of trying to squeeze in too much while still being a lazy poster. Whats the deal guys?