MadeInNewJersey
nursing my wounds
Reign in Acai said:If it's not worth purchasing, it's not worth listening imo.
That makes absolutely no fucking sense at all.
Reign in Acai said:If it's not worth purchasing, it's not worth listening imo.
Erik said:Yeah and I'm starting to think that you're right. BUT IT'S SO HARD TO RESIST. I mean like when new Katatonia leaks mid-December and it doesn't have an official release until GOD DAMN APRIL, what's a fanboy supposed to do?
Plzdatemekthx said:well, for me it should be simple because when it comes to non-metal, i very very VERY rarely download. mostly because my completely non-metal habits are in the 20 to 40 year old age realm, so the albums i purchase have like 298353508 reviews out there, and i go for mostly classics because it represents a smaller portion of my listening habits. i doubt i'll ever own the entire discography to Joy Division or the Pixies, but i will have one or two choice albums from each.
with metal it's completely different. since i'm overly exposed to it, i naturally become extremely picky when there are say 500 different bands to choose from in one particular style. so yeah i'll listen to Immortal - Battles in the North and recognize it as good shit, but have a personal preference toward Taake because i think they have nearly perfected a good formula.
i'm just babbling again, but i think this makes snes (haha, coolest typo evAr).
IOfTheStorm said:Meh im too tired to write my opinion on this again..since i fought alot with speed about it in another thread. The short story is : mp3s are gay, cdrs are gay, those who have huge cdr and mp3 discographies (and buy a lot less than the ones they have in mp3 and cdr) should vomit their intestines like the chick in city of the living dead did. And its not just supporting the band live, because most bands need to sale albums first before they manage to go on tour, give live shows.
Of course i am not talking about downloading an album at a time, or some samples, im talking about massive downloading and cd r collecting, and buying almost nothing.those who have huge cdr and mp3 discographies (and buy a lot less than the ones they have in mp3 and cdr) should vomit their intestines like the chick in city of the living dead did
In that case, a music fan will include cd(s) in his budget. If he doesn't, he might greatly enjoy music, but he's no fan. It's as simple as that.General Zod said:Or unless you're on a budget. If you're married and/or have kids, actually owning the CD may not be a priority. It may not be an expense you can justify to your spouse. For instance, if you buy 100 CDs a year, you're talking $1,500. That means 15 fewer nights where you can take the old lady for dinner and a movie, or buy the kids that new toy they want. These are just facts of life. People have priorities, and supporting the artist/owning the artwork often isn't one of them.
Zod
Yes, in that case, it seems that the only interest is to have as many "great" albums as possible, but unless you give it a proper listen, you won't understand its greatness at all.IOfTheStorm said:By the way i will never understand people who download albums all the time. I mean is it really neccesary to listen to all the music of the world in 1 year? Will you have the right time to give proper listens to it, in order to full understand it? Also most people listen an album they bought with much more attention than they do with an album they downloaded. You will give more spins and chances to the album you buy, but the album you downloaded .. you'll never know if you would like it after many listening sessions, and we all know that there are many great albums in music that are appreciated only after LOTS of listening.