Controversial opinions on metal

I really don't know why the fuck you keep saying I take a bus.

And keep it up with your faggot fucking car you unemployed piece of shit.
 
:lol: I should find your post of you admitting to taking the bus daily. Regardless you are a turd.

I drive my car to my campus at Rutgers and then I use the mandatory Rutgers busing system to travel between the different campuses to get to my classes. Now you can stop using the "lawlz u tayk teh bus" insult that makes you look so stupid due to the fact that it's blatantly wrong.

Also, go ahead and get your last shots in, I'm done with this, and I'm going to do my best to never address your worthless presence ever again, even if it means resorting to putting you on ignore.
 
Find it. Also, even if I can't recall having heard it, from all accounts that I can recall, it's not purely Black Metal anyway, as its heavily doused with Industrial influences.

So as soon as any band starts to incorporate other influences they automatically forfeit the Black Metal label? I sense too much purism in your nomenclature.
 
No shit, Sherlock.

The point I'm trying to make is that when the primary element in a band's sound is Black Metal, they have every right to be called a Black Metal band. Even if the proportion is 51% BM 49% something else, I call them Black Metal. The genre is far too dynamic and its formula is the perfect template to build upon with elements of other styles. It's a disservice not to take advantage of that for the sake of sacrosanctity.
 
There are three types of people. 1) those who like all of Slayer's albums, 2) those who only like their material up through Seasons, and 3) those who don't like Slayer at all.

#2 tends to be the norm around here.