You are being willfully ignorant. Let me ask you this: Would you consider it good reasoning if I replied to a claim that lots of car accidents happen by claiming that neither I nor anyone I know has been in a car accident?
This really isn't that complicated. If you aren't putting yourself in bad situations, you shouldn't have any problems. I go out and get drunk, walk around in public acting like a tool in downtown Indy and Broad Ripple all the time. However, the last time I ever talked to a cop who was questioning me was back when I was in high school for speeding (8 or so years ago).
I'm trying my best not to sound self-righteous, because I can't stand it when people act like that. But what else can I say? I just don't put myself in extremely bad situations. Whether you have or not, I don't know, however I am curious as to why you have this chip on your shoulder.
Because all existing laws are just and reasonable and cops only ever mess with people that are guilty of something, right?
So you think it's merely coincidental that people are busted multiple times for possession, dui, suspended license, speeding, etc, etc etcetcetcecetc?
Whether the laws are just or not is irrelevant. If you break the law, you are inherently taking the risk that if you are to be caught you will suffer the consequences. Ultimately that's your problem. If you want to take it out on the cop that busted you then go right ahead, but you're going to have a hard time convincing me to see it from your perspective when you were in the wrong from the get go, no matter how just or unjust the existing law is.
Seriously, how can someone justify getting pissed off about getting a speeding ticket if you were actually speeding? It makes no sense and is just dumb.