You should start spending more time with your kid instead of trying to impress people on this forum man. He might actually end up forgiving you for walking out on his mom when she was pregnant.
Absolutely. Of course, future pleasure is discounted by many people in many cases, if even seen.
Right, that's what I'm saying. I imagine gamers living with their parents aren't thinking about their futures all that much.
So perhaps I just took issue with the categorization that men preferring video games to working means they find the working world too easy. I often find crossword puzzles more intellectually stimulating than proofreading for journal submissions, but that's not because the latter is easier. I'd argue that it's harder specifically because it demands my attention for less immediate intellectual reward.
Likewise, I wouldn't say that women don't play video games specifically because they're less interested than men in the stimulation that accompanies playing video games. Giving up game-playing for committing to real-world work seems like a harder choice to make, and doesn't mean someone isn't interested in game-playing.
... you seem to not know a lot of things when it comes to women.I didn't know that about women and mobile games.
Women lean much more towards mobile games, which allows playing while at work. So they aren't really picking one over the other, they just aren't following PC Master Race and invested in Steam/XBOX/PS.
read to me like an 18-24 demographic, which I wouldn't say is the heavy focus on career for the average "lost" worker in our societyThe article was about post-grads, which is the time that most people should be entering into the early phases of their careers.
sure, maintaining sanity in garbage situations is difficult, but killing time at the pizza shop isn't setting you up for future success either. doesn't seem like the article is talking about those working shit jobs to pay off college expenses while still in school, for instance. more like the less skilled, less materialistic of the bunch.Apparently they don't if they can't extrapolate present boredom into future success. Playing video games isn't actually harder than working a 9-to-5 job at Jimmy John's, although it might be more actively stimulating.
yes, but I am leaning towards more of the competitive side and I'm guessing you never got exposed to that (not meaning to be condescending)I think you're confusing excitement and stimulation with difficulty. It's much harder to work a 9-to-5 job that you find dreadfully boring than it is to play a video game that's actively exciting.
read to me like an 18-24 demographic, which I wouldn't say is the heavy focus on career for the average "lost" worker in our society
sure, maintaining sanity in garbage situations is difficult, but killing time at the pizza shop isn't setting you up for future success either. doesn't seem like the article is talking about those working shit jobs to pay off college expenses while still in school, for instance. more like the less skilled, less materialistic of the bunch.
yes, but I am leaning towards more of the competitive side and I'm guessing you never got exposed to that (not meaning to be condescending)
which i think points to the lack of competitive nature -- since that's the major difference (since a phone costs as much as a fine desktop pc these days)
As of last year, 22 percent of men between the ages of 21 and 30 in the U.S. with less than a bachelor’s degree reported not working at all in the previous year—up from only 9.5 percent in 2000. And there’s evidence that video games are a big reason why. According to a recent study based on the Census Bureau’s time-use surveys, young men without college degrees have replaced 75 percent of the time they used to spend working with time on the computer, mostly playing video games. From 2004 to 2007, young, unemployed men without college degrees were spending 3.4 hours per week playing video games. By 2011 to 2014, the average time spent per week had more than doubled to 8.6 hours.