Torniojaws
They call me Juha
Holy shit, that's cool but what if REAPER decides to fuck off and crash? :O
I've got an mp3 player with me for backup


Holy shit, that's cool but what if REAPER decides to fuck off and crash? :O
That's fucking wicked man.
Amp modeling has really proven it's worth.
That's great.
I've always wondered about taking this approach with it. The automation during the set sounds amazingly liberating.
Brill, just what I thought really. So you have one reaper session for your whole setlist then. Who controls the laptop? For instance, I imagine you're not going to let it run continuously straight through with set gaps as you might have different interactions with the audience etc.
Holy shit, that's cool but what if REAPER decides to fuck off and crash? :O
I asked generally speaking. Thank you, I didn't know there was a technical term for such an installation. I would have said "sonorisation system" or something like that.
The reaper session is also one of my ideas to try next time I play live. It's so simple : if you already recorded your songs, you remove the waveforms in the guitar/bass/vox tracks, and that's done. You may remove the master bus processing and you're almost done. All samples are ready already, you may maybe change panning to adapt to venues, and you're done. To have different guitar tones, you simply adjust volume by automation in their tracks. So that you pass from disto to clean with full transparency.
Glad it went well, dude! What kind of settings did you use? I found that with my POD, if I use the same settings I use for recording, it ends up sounding like shit.
Holy shit, that's cool but what if REAPER decides to fuck off and crash? :O
This is a simpler version of what we will be doing with my band. We will use in ear monitoring to ensure that we get a good stage mix and keep the click track out of the main mix that plays through the pa. We plan on running two guitars, bass, drums and vocals through the computer and route everything to separate stereo mixes that we feed to the sound guy. The only things that will not be sent through the computer is the cymbals. We will use a lot of automation and synths as well.
The main thing that I'm pretty exited about is the fact that this will allow us to use quite a few backing tracks as well. We're two guitar players (I'm at the left side and he's at the right) and when I play a solo, my track gets panned center and boosted a few db's in volume. At the same time, a pre-recorded track kicks in on the left side and doubles what the other guitarplayer is playing, ensuring that the intensity of the rhythm sections never drops out. We plan on doing alot more crazy things this way, especially with vocal harmonies, effets and what-not. I really feel that this is the future for my band.
-Sigurd-
I'm blessed that my drummer is fucking tight and really great. Best of all, he actually doesn't mind being told what to play, while coming up with great parts himself.
whats the laptop specs dude? sounds like a great idea
We're using my stationary comp. It's optimized for music production anyway.
Our drummer uses the Rolad TD-20 set with real cymbals, and I'm pretty sure we'll use Slate Samples live. Can't wait to hear those slammin' through a big PA!
A desktop? Man, I would hate to have to bring around a desktop+monitor+mouse+keyboard to every gig...
Compared to two guitar amps and a bass amp? I don't think that's a lot to frag around at all.