Emdprodukt's Stinnett guitar

Will, I must say, this is the body shape that I would prefer when I buy one of your guitars.

Do you have any current builds featuring the inline headstock? I'm dying to see one of those!

-Joe
 
Will, I must say, this is the body shape that I would prefer when I buy one of your guitars.

Do you have any current builds featuring the inline headstock? I'm dying to see one of those!

-Joe

Sorry, man; not yet. Ive got two orders to fill with the inline but it will be a couple months before I get to them.

I want to try to whip out a simple M6 as a demo model pretty soon if I can find the time.
 
Possibly black limba (korina) for the body wings?

Gotta get an opinion from Olli first.

black-limba-.jpg
 
Olli, why do you want this to be a neck-trough? With a maple neck and an 81, chances are this will be a really bright guitar. Maybe that's just what you want but I thought you're almost exclusively a rhythm player.
 
Olli, why do you want this to be a neck-trough? With a maple neck and an 81, chances are this will be a really bright guitar. Maybe that's just what you want but I thought you're almost exclusively a rhythm player.

You'd be surprised... my Stinnett is actually far brighter than my M-I NTB; Stinnett is mahogany/maple cap (3/4" thick doesn't hurt!) with set maple neck/maple fb, M-I is maple neck thru/ebony fb, alder wings. The Stinnett is brighter, with more clarity and attack, but the M-I is fuller in the low mids and not as snappy.
 
A dense, high quality maple cap can make quite a difference IME. So does the density of the used maple for the neck. But yeah, there are certainly shades of grey here.
 
Yeah, quite true. I just found it super surprising that my ESP sounds solid with an 81 in the bridge despite the bright woods, and the Stinnett needed to be fattened up with the 89 in the bridge because of how bright it ended up being.