After reading this comment, I had to go back and watch "Kill Bill" a second time. I could have sworn I remembered a ton of Matrix-like style to the fight scenes. However, I was wrong. I was thinking of "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon". I believe I saw "CT,HD" on DVD the same weekend I saw "Kill Bill" in the theaters. Anyhow, you could see why I'd get the two confused; both were martial arts flicks, both used sub-titles, and both couldn't have possibly sucked more ass.JayKeeley said:Right, because The Matrix was the first film to show people punching and kicking each other. But if those are the only two movies you've ever seen, then I guess it makes total sense.
Though I didn't like it at all (fell asleep half way through it), I can see the appeal of "CT,HD". But for the life of me, I can't understand what is redeeming about "Kill Bill". I have liked everything else Tarantino has ever done, so I'll give him a pass here. However, when I think about Tarantinos films, I think "superb dialogue and interesting characters". Kill Bill had none of that. It's a simple revenge plot, with remedial dialogue, characters with no depth, and requires more suspension of disbelief than your average film starring The Rock. Let's forget for a second that for some bizarre reason Umas legs have atrophied, but her arms have not. The movie's climatic scene has a skinny white chick wiping out the entire Japanese mafia. If Uma wasn't in it, who I'd pay to watch read the Yellow Pages, I wouldn't have lasted 30 minutes into the movie.
The only interesting question this movie raises is, would you have sex with a comatose Uma Thurman?
Zod