Opeth0507 said:Most people call me prejudice or racist when I say this, but I believe that it isn't right. For the fact that man wasn't created for that purpose, but that doesn't mean that I HATE that person, it just means that I don't approve of their style of living.
Sure, and if some particularly nasty genetic disease is overdominant, then that species would die out. However, they often arent, they are usually recessive, because of that. Homosexuality is also recessive, meaning it can occur without wiping the species out. Its NOT unnatural, since it has a genetic basis. Some animals in the wild have displayed homosexual behavior. Saying homosexuality is unnatural is the same as saying cystic fibrosis is unnatural, so they shouldnt be allowed to marry. Im sorry thats eugenics, and thats bullshit. Plain and simple. If you want to use the crutch of religion to be the basis of the anti-homosexuality argument, thats fine, but there is no basis in science.Danallica said:Yeh i agree totally - the idea of having men and women is to procreate - to make more life, if everyone was gay life would not exist. Simple.
Scott W said:Sure, and if some particularly nasty genetic disease is overdominant, then that species would die out. However, they often arent, they are usually recessive, because of that. Homosexuality is also recessive, meaning it can occur without wiping the species out. Its NOT unnatural, since it has a genetic basis. Some animals in the wild have displayed homosexual behavior. Saying homosexuality is unnatural is the same as saying cystic fibrosis is unnatural, so they shouldnt be allowed to marry. Im sorry thats eugenics, and thats bullshit. Plain and simple. If you want to use the crutch of religion to be the basis of the anti-homosexuality argument, thats fine, but there is no basis in science.
smartest 22 year-old i've ever seenScott W said:Ever worn a poly-cotton blend? Id be willing to bet you have. Its equally sinful. Ever had sex without being married? Equally sinful. The worst part about christians is that they blame people for violating something in the bible by quoting a verse, meanwhile they break tons of rules, but because that rule isnt detestable to them, its not important. Either the whole thing is truth, or its not. I hate the way christians cherry pick which rules have to be fought to the death, and which can be ignored. Its ridiculous.
To red dragon, I never once stated that our society has ACHIEVED the secular government that was wanted. Im just saying this society was NEVER a christian republic as so many neocons like to use as a talking point. My ultimate point was, in the US, marriage is NOT a religious event. Im fully aware that our country is intolerant of unchristian beliefs and at 22, Im not THAT young. but the fact is, this country is not nearly as extreme as you present it. And Freedom of Religion was NOT meant to be different denominations of christianity, if thats what it became, oh well, but that was NOT what it was meant to stand for. In fact, in order for some territories to become states, they had to REMOVE laws requiring people to be christian to hold government jobs, doesnt sound like the extreme viewpoint you are presenting. In addition, Ill assume you arent aware of the fact that many of the founding fathers (including Jefferson and Franklin) were Deists, which is NOT a christian spiritual belief.
also:
no.
i am a lot closer to being a psychologist than a biologist so from my POV... since homosexuality has a genetic basis and is seen in animals then it seems that the people who are "homophobic" are suffering from some sort of psychosis... and yeah eugenics is bullshit i'm not gonna kill people just because they've become sterile/disabled... and again smartest 22 i've ever seenScott W said:Sure, and if some particularly nasty genetic disease is overdominant, then that species would die out. However, they often arent, they are usually recessive, because of that. Homosexuality is also recessive, meaning it can occur without wiping the species out. Its NOT unnatural, since it has a genetic basis. Some animals in the wild have displayed homosexual behavior. Saying homosexuality is unnatural is the same as saying cystic fibrosis is unnatural, so they shouldnt be allowed to marry. Im sorry thats eugenics, and thats bullshit. Plain and simple. If you want to use the crutch of religion to be the basis of the anti-homosexuality argument, thats fine, but there is no basis in science.
Can you say "Chatholic" and "Nazi" and "dictator"???xicor said:Thing is, I think I'm right. I think most of my ways are right. If most of my ways are right, I want people to be like me. Thats my thought process.
I believe my religion is right. I want everyone to be saved. I believe everyone should follow my religion. Thats my thought process.
But that doesnt mean they shouldnt have equal rights, that would be no different than having women have unequal rights.
again "Chatholic" and "Nazi"xicor said:Nope, its called premarital sex.
lol, it won't make them straight, but it will make me happy that they are not defiling marriage with their homosexuality.
I will never have a gay son... I will bring him up to be like me and dislike gays.
I meant the word "Nazi" like the word "dictator" which explains my comments if you read the stuff i "quoted"Blaphbee said:Wow, you say "Nazi" like it's a bad thing, as if calling a person a name or a slander actually debunks his argument or the ideas he's talking about. Why is that? (this should be fun)