Kvlt Wench
sews no mercy
He also thinks that abortion causes illegal immigration!
"It might be that for the last 35 years, we have aborted more than a million people who would have been in our workforce."
How the fuck did he even come up with that?
How are you voting in 08 and the presidential primaries
- Thread starter flying_whale
- Start date
He also thinks that abortion causes illegal immigration!
"It might be that for the last 35 years, we have aborted more than a million people who would have been in our workforce."
How the fuck did he even come up with that?
Det Som Engang Var
Viking Bastard
Kvlt Wench
sews no mercy
Captain Beard
No longer active
- Sep 6, 2001
- 28,010
- 99
- 48
actually Huckabee would make A MUCH better president than Ron Paul. see ron paul is very dumb and christian, while Huckabee is just Christian. Looking at the state of the Arkansas during the Huckabee years you will find that he didn't turn the states that much to the right as Ron Paul's voting streak in the House is. He is Christian. So? Voting against someone for what he believes is equally dumb from both the liberal and conservative side. I don't give a fuck if he hail Jesus every day, but that doesn't make his tax policy any worse or any better. I was just researching that. He is fiscally responsible and proved against dumb and blind republican fiscal relaxation like Romney and Ron Paul and Giuliani are. I might not agree 100% with his tax policy, i won't get into economic details. I don't vote for Huckabee, but most of you here are equally biased just as pat roberston and jerry fallwel are, just on the other side. Honestly between all the Republicans Huckabee is the most responsible in terms of foreign and economic policy. He said countless of times that he doesn't want to force religion down people throats, even if he is a conservative evangelical, and his record as governor in Arkansas almost proves that.
And on social issues, since you brought up romney, the mormon, he vetoed as governorn of Massachuststes attempt of the then Republican legislature to make abortion illegal and he donated to planned parenthood money. He changed his views now to try to get ellected, but so did McCain (McCain slamed the religious right in 2000 quite hard)
And on social issues, since you brought up romney, the mormon, he vetoed as governorn of Massachuststes attempt of the then Republican legislature to make abortion illegal and he donated to planned parenthood money. He changed his views now to try to get ellected, but so did McCain (McCain slamed the religious right in 2000 quite hard)
Kvlt Wench
sews no mercy
An atheist would be optimal, or at least someone who can separate his religious ideals from his politics.
Captain Beard
No longer active
- Sep 6, 2001
- 28,010
- 99
- 48
One step at a time... seems many of the jewtypes are one step away from non-theism anyway. A good number are lapsed/non-practicing, from what I've seen.
Kvlt Wench
sews no mercy
Yeah, even my weirdo orthodox relatives applied their stupid values to THEMSELVES and not anyone else.
Yeah, faggots, read what I copy-and-pasted from another forum. That solves everything.
Paul, as you well know, the problem is that all of the candidates suck. Without getting into how Huckabee's a creationist or Obama voted for renewing the PATRIOT ACT, all we have is a bunch of neutered pseudosocialists and creepy old men who just want to jack off to how much they think they look like Ronald Reagan. The 2008 election will be a failure of epic proportions, period,
Jeff
Lord Foul
I don't spank men
There are plenty of douchebag zealot Jews, they just find it more effective to be lobbyists/special interests in the US. Easier to buy a candidate than run yourself.
Why is this a good thing? I support small government where that term means minimizing bureaucracy and having a light footprint (i.e. only have laws about things that really need laws). Here it appears to mean moving bureaucracy from one centralized location to 50 different locations where there will be more difficulty/less incentive for them to work together.
With that system, states like Texas that feel like not having income taxes or massive restrictions have less to worry about, while California can keep jacking off to catalytic converters as long as it wants. Not what I want either, but it would be a step in the right direction.
Jeff
Jeff
Here is the ideal candidate
hold tight
ready
Nicolas Sarkozy
I knew that Obama voted for the renewing of the patriot act, and so did Hilary, and Edwards.
To me Ron Paul would be the move in the totally wrong direction, especially on economic issues, provided the economy is very shit at this point in time. Oh and Ronald Reagan was a failure in foreign policy IMHO, a very short sighted president.
(Yes I copied that from SS.org, because i felt people here need to know what that votes on in the House, which is pretty different than what he is saying)
I completely agree with this statement. I haven't seen a single candidate that I can say I feel comfortable voting for. We'll see how it goes in the next few months.
I just feel that there is too much power in the Federal government, that it has the right to regulate too many things where the state government should regulate. Ron Paul takes it to the extreme though kind of. Ex: He's for legalization of all drugs and trafficking of drugs on the federal level. He believes everything should be up to the states to decide how and if to control such issues.
Liverslapper
w00t
Det Som Engang Var
Viking Bastard
Captain Beard
No longer active
- Sep 6, 2001
- 28,010
- 99
- 48
derek
Grey Eminence
WhiteBeastofWotan
Apostitutes!
Similar threads
