How much of GDP is produced by teenagers?
less than 1%. Economically, they are useless, who just consume more than they really need. In order to consume, people should earn it. My parents don't drive me around. And so do many parents of kids who don't have cars. We just take the fucking bus, granted seattle has one of the best public transportation systems in the county. Ask yourselves, how many teenagers drive in Europe? not nearly as many as they do here. You Americans, take the commodity of driving for granted, and it really isn't for granted. I personally do a one hour commute to school each way. It is really not that bad. If i go to a show at studio seven my commute is equally long. Fact of life, I haven't suffered a tiny bit from not driving. Again, stop spending money on gasoline and get public transportation together. Public transportation consumes less oil, pollutes less, and eases trafic.
But what else are 21-year-olds doing? I don't know, getting educated? That's very valuable when viewed as an investment. Try doing that math and say that spending all your time on education is being useless.
Not everyone has public transportation available, and just about anyone who studies and works at the same time (that'll be a lot of us) has trouble working around the bus' schedule. Working for you doesn't imply working for everyone - didn't you just say you were useless? I'm hauling my ass around between school and tutoring (closest thing I have to a job) and I can't do that with the bus' schedule - not only am I literally across town very often, the buses don't run 24/7 here.
And no, there is nothing wrong with teenagers being useless socially and economically. That is how it is supposed to be. While under 21 people should learn and gain experiences, not work, at the same time, they shouldn't drive and have all those privileges until they actually do something. [/quote]
There's a difference between not earning anything and being useless. Look at how much more someone with a bachelor's degree makes than someone without one.
flying_whale said:
yes, Jeff, I (the government, if i were the government) am in the perfect position to decide who gets to drive and who doesn't, because that is why you have government to decide shit. For all of America, shoving dollars up dirty Arab ass isn't the best thing. Even worse, being dependent on them is a shitty idea. Not letting teenagers drive will decrease oil consumption with minimal damage to the economy. In fact, lower oil prices will help the economy and will slow down the rising inflation.
You're mixing up the problem of Arab oil with the problem of NEEDLESS INTERFERENCE WITH EVERYONE'S LIVES - if that's your goal, mandate a switch to different fuel systems. This is like trying to lose weight by cutting your hair off - you're forgetting that teenagers still need to be driven around, and that they don't demand nearly as much gas as adults. This is a backasswards solution at best. 'Minimal damage to the economy' is a fucking laugh - as I said earlier, education is very important to the economy, and damaging it ruins the economy. Directly mandating new fuel systems will be much more effective and even less damaging to the economy.
At this point you've failed not only at having a decent argument but putting it across right; whether you really believe this stuff or not the best thing you can do for your cause is stop trying to defend it. You're making any valid point you may have look horribly stupid, so shutting up is going to be more effective at changing people's minds than trying to argue. You're inexperienced and you've clearly never been in a situation where your ideas would have much of an effect on you, and your posts show it very clearly, so the most noble thing to do for your cause is stop making it look so bad
by associating yourself with it.
Jeff