Oblivious Maximus
I am the worm
The key word being "inconsistent" which seems to come up in every article relating to the case. Not only that, but the judge even referred one of the accusers of being "willfully deceptive".I've actually been following it quite closely, one of the most inconsistent accusations I've ever read about.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/25/world/jian-ghomeshi-verdict-canada-feat/index.html
Yet clearly Henein is the one to demonize here.Ontario Court Justice William Horkins appeared to give little consideration to the amount of time that had passed in evaluating the strength of the women's memories. In a scathing 26-page judgment focusing on inconsistencies in their accounts to the police, the media and the court, Horkins suggested that willful deception was to blame rather than faulty memory, as prosecutors argued.
After deliberating for more than a month, Horkins announced the judgment Thursday in a Toronto courtroom with Ghomeshi, his family and his supporters present.
"The harsh reality is that once a witness has been shown to be deceptive and manipulative in giving their evidence, that witness can no longer expect the Court to consider them to be a trusted source of the truth," he said Thursday. "I am forced to conclude that it is impossible for the Court to have sufficient faith in the reliability or sincerity of these complainants. Put simply, the volume of serious deficiencies in the evidence leaves the Court with a reasonable doubt."