i don't understand the distinction you're trying to make here
We can and do pin that word to religious violence. It's just that you're sitting here trying to unpin it from Islam while playing down Islamic terrorism and claiming that Muslims are more peaceful than Christians.
It's a giant clusterfuck of needless bias.
To radicalize something is to make it (more) radical. Is your point just to say that fundamentalist Islam operated in Northern Africa and the Middle East? Then duh. So did fundamentalist Christianity for much of the same time period. My point is that the general direction of Islam in the first half of the 20th century was moving in the opposite direction of radicalization. It was gradually becoming moderate and governments of Islamic nations were gradually becoming secular.
muslims on a whole are far more peaceful than Christians. The fact that you're grouping all of them as radicals or terrorist is very telling of where your mindset is at. There are christians committing atrocious, mindboggling crimes against others every second of everyday, but yet we're more peaceful than they are?
Is your point just to say that fundamentalist Islam operated in Northern Africa and the Middle East? Then duh.
So did fundamentalist Christianity for much of the same time period
My point is that the general direction of Islam in the first half of the 20th century was moving in the opposite direction of radicalization.
am I back in high school or something? everyone knows Christianity killed lots of people and was radicalized and politicized for global conquest. why are we acting like "omg i'm saying christianity is just as bad as islam oooooo my god"
no, my point is that there were radical and non-radical muslim political movements. that's why radical and radicalized are interchangeable here
am I back in high school or something? everyone knows Christianity killed lots of people and was radicalized and politicized for global conquest. why are we acting like "omg i'm saying christianity is just as bad as islam oooooo my god"
yeah i don't think this is true at all. muslim nations have had power vacuums since the fall of the ottoman empire in ww1 and nothing but stabilization is going to de-radicalize any nation
And who creates those power vacuums? Who deposed Mossadegh, Gadaffi, Saddam, etc? Who is currently trying to create a new power vacuum in Syria?
If you have to go back to North Africa in the 1800s, then you have to consider what Christianity was doing around the same time.
Sure, obviously, not sure how that contradicts anything I've said.
Citation needed.
you're being dishonest and trying to move the discussion to bring up some shitty facts that the west(U.S.) intervened in the middle east. it isn't relevant. you said muslim nations were de-radicalizing in the 1st half of the 20th century. the truth is the opposite and the reasons why aren't needed to be known when you make an incorrect claim. you want to say meddling by the west created/inflamed political turmoil in the middle east and africa? anyone educated/informed cannot deny it
Islam has had a strong hold on northern africa way before Europeans and Christianity. it's why the northern half is nearly entirely muslim and vice versa for southern africa
you just made it seem like you cant use both words when describing islam
I'm not a remotely politically correct person and have no issue with calling out radical Islamists for being radical Islamists.
Sure, obviously Arab conquest occurred, now we're going back to medieval times? The Catholic Church was literally no better.
If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it.
the evidence is irrelevant, I just said that. you're too fixated on pointing out christianity that this conversation has become tedious
There's not a religious bone in my body
because you have people like cassette claiming that muslims are radicals, terrorist, baaaayyyde people, but christians arent.![]()
you cant be that separated from reality, can you? Wow you are beyond ignorant, i swear. Are you really implying that muslims commit more violent crimes such killings(women, children, men, etc), rape, etc than the western countries? oh my dear god.
Dude, there isnt a day that passes where you turn the news on and you dont see some white trash hillbillies who raped, killed and buried their child somewhere in the forest or other similarly horific, atrocious disguting incidents. Here area few, but if you think im going to keep spendging my time looking through countless articles for your entertainment, than you better think again. I'll leave that to you.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...d-up-disable-adopted-daughter-police-say.html
http://ktla.com/2016/09/06/child-po...aulting-killing-11-year-old-jacob-wetterling/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...nherently-violent-and-the-math-proves-it.html
"What about violent crime? Here Muslims are way behind the rest of us—and in a good way. Homicide rates in Muslim-majority countries average about two murders per annum per 100,000 people. In non-Muslim countries, the average rate is about 8 per 100,000. Murder rates fluctuate from year to year, but they are consistently low in Muslim societies. The homicide rate in Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim country, is 1 per 100,000—one-fifth the rate of the world’s largest Christian country, the United States. Christian countries live with murder rates that are unknown in the Muslim world. Brazilians and Mexicans are used to murder rates in the 15-25 range; the rate in Venezuela tops 50. Turks, Egyptians, Iranians, and Malaysians live with rates in the 2-4 range. In a good year, Christian South Africa lives with a murder rate of around 30. In a bad year, the rate in Muslim Senegal is one-tenth of that. Anyone who is skeptical of these numbers is invited to walk through minaret-dotted Dakar and steeple-studded Johannesburg at night and compare their experiences in the two cities. For that matter, have a stroll after dark in the low-income areas of Istanbul or Ankara. Then do so in Philadelphia or Oakland."
Besides the Muslim cock up your ass.![]()
Talk about goalpost shifting. Now we're only talking about examples from America?
It's just that you're sitting here trying to unpin it from Islam while playing down Islamic terrorism and claiming that Muslims are more peaceful than most Christians.
[laughs inside your mum's cunt]
Support your claim that most Muslims are peaceful and are more peaceful than Christians. Because that is hilarious.
if you are going to run off and snitch to the mods once this shit escalates?
bitch why are you going to start with the name calling
cuck
you cant be that separated from reality, can you? Wow you are beyond ignorant, i swear.
Are you that stupid or do you need me to point out again that all you keep doing is mentioning my post that was in response to HBB's post about when the Levant was radicalized? How dense can you possibly be? You're clearly nothing more than a western bigot
Aug is infinitely more educated than you are
And which moron needed you to point out that Iran isnt populated by arabs?
Anyone that fails to see why Islam has so many radicals today is just being super ignorant.
the fact that most of the clueless fucks buy into the whole "mulsims are terrorist" shtick is disgusting.
we have oppressed them, and anyone that doesn't see that is a grade A ignorant bigot.
bitch why are you going to start with the name calling