you made it sound like there was no islamic radicalization until WW2
i doubt it. Aug is infinitely more educated than you are and has been all over this planet. He would know the difference between an arab and a Persian.
nah dude, northern Africa was radicalized against other Muslim sects as well as christianity. I feel like you're ignoring ethnic hatred inside Islam as well
EDIT: The Shah was of course heavily influenced by Western powers, not the best example there though Mosaddegh was in many ways moderate as well (certainly not a radical Muslim).
its that islam was radicalized in africa and the middle east for a long damn time
this isnt a dick measuring contest, its that islam was radicalized in africa and the middle east for a long damn time
i don't understand the distinction you're trying to make here
We can and do pin that word to religious violence. It's just that you're sitting here trying to unpin it from Islam while playing down Islamic terrorism and claiming that Muslims are more peaceful than Christians.
It's a giant clusterfuck of needless bias.
To radicalize something is to make it (more) radical. Is your point just to say that fundamentalist Islam operated in Northern Africa and the Middle East? Then duh. So did fundamentalist Christianity for much of the same time period. My point is that the general direction of Islam in the first half of the 20th century was moving in the opposite direction of radicalization. It was gradually becoming moderate and governments of Islamic nations were gradually becoming secular.
muslims on a whole are far more peaceful than Christians. The fact that you're grouping all of them as radicals or terrorist is very telling of where your mindset is at. There are christians committing atrocious, mindboggling crimes against others every second of everyday, but yet we're more peaceful than they are?
Is your point just to say that fundamentalist Islam operated in Northern Africa and the Middle East? Then duh.
So did fundamentalist Christianity for much of the same time period
My point is that the general direction of Islam in the first half of the 20th century was moving in the opposite direction of radicalization.
am I back in high school or something? everyone knows Christianity killed lots of people and was radicalized and politicized for global conquest. why are we acting like "omg i'm saying christianity is just as bad as islam oooooo my god"