HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,850
- 113
Oh yeah, forgot about that part. nvm then.
I get women but children? Seriously?I don't see why women or even children should be spared when they directly benefited from and existed to perpetuate the institution that men put into power.
here's a new piece by Haidt, haven't read it yet but sure it's full of good stuff
https://www.city-journal.org/html/age-outrage-15608.html
What else are you supposed to do with them? They'd grow up to be in a society that despised them and there would always be the potential of them turning out like their parents. The majority of whites fled before the massacres anyways, I kind of doubt there were that many children left. In general I suppose soldiers have an easier conscience letting children just starve or become street criminals after being kicked out of society, which is how it usually turns out, but the end effect isn't much different from murder.
What a garbage opinion. Any halfway decent human being would think that the killing of the children was wrong, but you justify it because their life could potentially be shitty afterwards? The numbers dont matter either; even if it was only one child, the act of killing him/her would be just as wrong.
What a garbage opinion. Any halfway decent human being would think that the killing of the children was wrong, but you justify it because their life could potentially be shitty afterwards? The numbers dont matter either; even if it was only one child, the act of killing him/her would be just as wrong.
If you think one ex-slave revolutionary murdering one child of a slaver somehow disqualifies the ethical basis of the entire revolution
what have you done about anything you care about
"Like, everything is bad dude, the solution is like, to do nothing, god it feels good being a radical centrist"