If Mort Divine ruled the world

https://billypenn.com/2017/12/14/ph...s-councilwoman-cindy-bass/?platform=hootsuite

I didn't think the removal of agency would go this far. (black/brown) individual uses/abuses booze/drugs, let's legally bully (from what I can tell) the store owners to fix the problems of said individuals. so goofy

Shocking that Vietnamese vote Republican more than any other Asian ethnic group. Almost as if some groups commit gun homicide at disproportionate rates, and that others are disproportionately victimized.

Wonder how she's set up for security at her home. Hopefully a stray bullet decides to test it.
 
“I saw it. I never said that,” Bass said of calling the windows racist. “And the first thing about it is I could care less what these people think. They don’t vote for me. They don’t live in my district. They’re not from these communities. They’re not plagued by stop-and-gos.

:lol:
 
According to her, 90% of those Asian stores are actually fronts for drug dealing. I'd therefore estimate that 900% of black people shoot store owners.
 
I like this idea that the extra precautions like the bulletproof glass don't actually serve a realworld purpose and they're just there to make the locals feel unwelcome. Because nothing says "I'm an asshole"/"a racist" more than spending God knows how much extra money to fortify your cash register area when you don't need to.

They couldn't possibly have their reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ozzman and Dak
It's those goddamned fucking racist zipperheads and their long history of supporting Jim Crow laws and segregation. It's almost as if people forgot that Robert Lee was Korean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ozzman and Dak
I honestly don't like the idea of professors losing their jobs for the things they say, but at the same time advocating for genocide (even in some kind of retarded far-left ironic way) must be a universal line. Same with professor Johnny Eric in that video who called for first responders to let white victims die as a way to fight back against "whiteness."

Nobody would ever accept it from a right-wing professor and these extremist ideologues need to be pushed back against in some fucking way.
 
It was an ironic use of the word genocide in relation to erasing the white race through miscegenation. I see no problem with the way I worded my sentence in my post.

And the point would also be that any ironic use of the word in relation to any other race by a professor wouldn't be tolerated by university guidelines.
 
The problem with your phrasing is that you’re eliding the fact that he’s poking fun at alt-right rhetoric, which hyperbolically casts miscegenation as genocide. It’s not an ironic advocaction of genocide; it’s an ironic jab at rhetoric that labels something genocide when it clearly isn’t.

He’s basically saying “if that’s genocide, then sure—hooray for white genocide!”

Within the context of the conversation, it’s entirely acceptable and not unwarranted.
 
Well I guess this is what happens when you decide to roll around in the mud with the alt-right and use their slang when you're a professor in a position of power, privilege and influence, you lose your job because we've created a society that doesn't respect context and there is a lot of danger in engaging edgy political rhetoric like he did.

This also wasn't his only controversy, there were several students who dropped his class because they were fed up with his rantings and racism. At this point I really have no sympathy left for professors.

racist1.png

He's not a serious thinker. He's a communist piece of shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HamburgerBoy
Twitter is not the place to have that kind of argument, unfortunately. It’s how academics shoot themselves in the foot. Alas, they’re trying to engage the public, but doing it poorly.

On the flip side, the general public puts in zero effort when trying to have conversations with academics.
 
Like I said, I actually don't like the idea of professors or teachers being fired or pressured by the public to quit over things they say, but at the same time I think professors like the two interviewed in that video are having their cake and eating it too.

They're beneficiaries of academic freedom and the tolerance of colleges/universities - getting away with saying ridiculous shit all the time - while at the same time they actively engage in the no-platforming, silencing and mobbing up on anybody who says something "problematic" and this duality of contradiction has absolutely no balance to it.

I also don't really see much of this as academics trying to engage the public, they're more just virtue-signalling to their comrades and romanticising violent revolutions to the same degree the American right romanticises their military. Calling the massacre of whites during the Haitian Revolution "a good thing indeed" is just repugnant shit. It wasn't just slave owners and masters being killed, it was everybody. Men, women, children.
 
Twitter is not the place to have that kind of argument, unfortunately. It’s how academics shoot themselves in the foot. Alas, they’re trying to engage the public, but doing it poorly.

On the flip side, the general public puts in zero effort when trying to have conversations with academics.

Right on both counts. However, academics rarely do better on mediums other than Twitter, and of course the general public generally puts in zero effort in those other circumstances too. There's a dual issue of disconnect by those of the ivory tower from the experiences of those in the general public, combined with the IQ difference which makes the general public not give a shit even when that disconnect isn't an issue.