CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Anyways, the Gregg guy has attempted to put the joke into some context: http://twitter.com/GreggHurwitz/status/958001109427089408


Last edited:
and in turn making themselves look racist.
this doesn't make sense
but the deep hatred and resentment of white canadians towards indians isnt hard to draw a conclusion there
You seem to have a very low opinion of white Canadians. Noted.
he was smearing all Indians as alcoholic thieves because of a racist stereotype they themselves harbour in their own minds.
it's just confirmation bias for people who are buttmad that he slaughtered that British feminist on TV.
to act like this historical and ethnic connection is hard to connect is hilariously arrogant of you. woke twitterists or those that live near reservations are well aware of this connection and all citizens should be in Canada and the U.S
he had one good come back and really just stood there like a dope taking her shit for 25 minutes.
to act as if JP is the only one getting heat for stereotypical attempts at humor is hilarious
It was essentially an in-joke that people are now turning into a generalized statement on all indigenous people by Jordan Peterson, which is inaccurate and dishonest.
He annihilated her.
and if it was, JP is responsible for his words in which he communicated poorly in a public space.
he allowed her to mischaracterize his entire thinking and didn't do anything. 'slaughter' and 'annihilate', are you 12? come on![]()
It was basically a blueprint for how to handle an adversarial interview.
but I also think the public have a responsibility to consider context and not jump to wild conclusions.
if you're a bitch, yeah
he's an adult, he's a communicator, he uses twitter to bolster his success. he is responsible, not 'to some degree.'
I admittedly didn't know the context of the comment, which makes the entire scenario seem less douchey.
I do, however, stand by my comment about Peterson being a provocateur
I don't think he's particularly intelligent, based on what I've seen from him.
The lengths you go to dismiss him are more absurd.
I'm not arguing that he's on Chomsky's level, I'm arguing that often is the case someone belittles the intelligence of blatantly intelligent people due to ideological biases, like you with JP.
I also disagree that he's not a critical thinker, he may have his blindspots much like anybody else (ie Chomsky and his 'all roads lead to it being America's fault' tautological thinking) but I think you're being unreasonable.
I think you have a feeling about JP that you go with, which is why your criticisms of him are usually either quite vague, a mischaracterization or an accusation with little specificity.
Not gonna defend the specific tweet as it is fairly offensive
As I've said before, it's difficult when the only options are to read his book(s) or watch his videos. Videos really aren't my preferred mode of communication, and I find it very difficult to digest them.