CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
You're also extrapolating (and speculating) that the reason I can't separate personal ethics from policy is that I'm an authoritarian sympathizer. There are other reasons why I might have difficulty doing so.
You're being obtuse? I dunno, but I think it's absolutely possible to separate one's personal ethics from what should be imposed socially. I'm a damn near teetotaler these days, but I'm opposed to the drug wars and prohibition. I think one of the biggest problems with the hard-left and hard-right is an inability to separate the personal from the political.
There's also the issue here of how you define choice. If my ethics mean that a fetus at the stage of viability cannot be aborted, you would say I am forcing parenthood on someone and taking away their choice, but couldn't the same be said for laws that prohibit the murder of a disabled child or adult? If the law steps in to protect the disabled person, is guardianship not being forced on someone here? I think your concept of choice is a false premise, because in no other situation do we consider not being allowed to kill an innocent person a negation of choice.
This ties in to how you consider animals' lives to be as valuable as humans'. You value the life of an animal you also kill and eat more than a fetus but at the same level of a human...? You're an inconsistent mess on something as basic as the value of life.