Einherjar86
Active Member
You sure about that? The letter demands that the US "end the embargo", which implies reinstating arms sales to Cuba, even though Cuba is a staunch ally of Russia. The BLM letter makes no mention of Russia, and my impression is that BLM doesn't give a shit about the danger Cuba poses as a member of an alliance hostile to the US, because BLM operates in an ideological vacuum where the world revolves exclusively around racial justice issues.
Cuba already trades with other countries, including those that have advanced weapons programs. The point of BLM's "end the embargo" message was intended specifically to provide Cuba with medical supplies (which weren't technically included in the embargo, hence why it was a bit of a misfire).
Long story short, I think it's unfair to accuse BLM of being unconscientious when it comes to the sale of arms to Cuba by U.S. companies, when arms are only one aspect of the embargo. If arms deals were to resume between the U.S. and Cuba, then I think it would be more prudent to argue that the U.S. companies engaging in those deals are the more responsible actors.
Last edited: