kev
Im guybrush threepwood
@kev: i totally agree with you. Intel makes basically the same chip, they test them and locate their highest stable clock and charge more for the faster ship (they also turn off parts of the cache to compensate as well). They do the same thing with multicores, the chores that fail inspection are turned of hence having the same platform chip, one being a dual core, tri core and quad core. You can unlock those cores but they may or not be stable and may or may not work correctly.
As for the clock frequency it comes down to this, with a 980x, you know that it will run stable all the time at 3.3GHz, however, you cannot guarantee that the 930x (the same internally) will be stable at that same speed, so yes you could overclock and get the same performance for much cheaper, but it will always be less stable at that speed. When you are hitting your processor hard onwards to maximum load even stable stock frequencies can become unstable, which means an overclocked CPU will give out much sooner. In joey's case if he is pushing a sextuple core to maximum load an overclocked 930x will become unstable much sooner. And beside that a stock frequency CPU will have a longer lifespan than an overclocked CPU.
its like vacuum tubes, they test them, seeing if they pass basic quality, the cheap ones are thrown into a batch of unlabled tubes sold for cheaper, high gain or balanced tubes (where the current is higher and where the current is equal on both triodes (matched pair for Pentodes) respectively) we pay a premium price for since there are fewer of them.
The cheap man's solution is to overclock a cheaper CPU which i do not object I used to do that until I got my hands on the fastest dual core that AMD makes so I do not need to compensate unless I want to start competing with the quad cores in bandwidth. On the other hand if you do not care about money to some degree and want the fastest most stable setup, you pay the premium to get it, and I don't think Joey cares about the price difference.
Yep defo dude, it looks like its going down for the best of the best to be run stock. I might be inclined to agree anyway, given what a pro tools rig costs lmao. The only thing I would say about the point you raised on stability is that I reckon chips have come on a long way in recent years with that. In real life terms, I would be quite surprised if an i7 930 overclocked at 3.33ghz would give up the ghost before i7 980x at 3.33ghz stock.