I'm already amused at the notion of me posting in this thread.
Anyway, I think the problem with the SJW is the problem with a lot of social science really. It's not that it's one sided so much as that it's philosophically dry and one dimensional. I know enough of these people and have read enough of this shit to know that it's basically never ending. There is no end in sight of Whiteness studies, african american studies etc etc. The very same US model, courtesy of the 1950s/60s sociology gets exported everywhere, even random European countries that literally never had a colony and were even enslaved by none whites. Why do these white people need to be educated/ brainwashed in the same way?
I don't trust all of this social science shit because it's intellectually hollow, excessively repetitive and caters to the simpleminded. A lot of it completely ignores economics and massive parts of human history. I've read some essays that suggest that the actual direction that Western society takes is not important, it doesn't matter if people are well off or not, or anything like that, all that matters is that the cultural predominance of White people and White males in particular comes into decline.
Personally, I associate that with what I call false ethnocentrism. False because it does nothing to further the real interests of the relevant ethnic group. It's a bit like ISIS. They wont create a lasting caliphate that helps all of the Muslims in the world, they'll just do things that lead to Muslims dying and having miserable lives.
Well, where are all of the Black American doctors, lawyers, scientists, engineers, politicians etc, sending millions of money to Africa, pressuring the government to pump more aid into Africa? Black people make up about 10 times a greater percentage of the US population than the Jews, so why not?
Questions like, how should society be run, what is best in life (conan), which civilization ordered things best, any decent talking point like that is totally avoided with all of this shit left wing social science. It's all grievance, grievance, grievance and ego, ego, ego.
I remember when I was in Africa with some dumbass white middle class liberal people. Anyway, they were whining like hell about the local advertising campaigns featuring few or no white people. This was not South Africa. There were almost no white people, in terms of a percentage of the population, even the economic elite were mostly black. This is the thing, in the same way that people can do awful things in the name of supremacist white racism, people can do pretty bad things in response or reaction to it. Japanese war crimes come to mind, as do Zimbabwe's agricultural "reforms" and economic policies.
Ultimately, I think intelligent people who consider the concept of a future utopia will come across the fundamental problem. Perfection is relative. Value systems differ and many people in the world are probably the unfortunate consequence of a confusion of value systems. Most of the cultures that have existed in history have not produce widespread prosperity. In fact, the English model of organising society is one of the very few that have. Due to human nature, it seems incredibly likely to me that people will always look at prosperity in the West and associate it with historical grievances affecting their home countries, or look to social science to find evidence of the endless racism that gives them the psychological excuse to be non- productive in society. Perfection is, by a true and honest definition, the perfection of a specific value system. When you factor in the aspect of human nature that makes identity unavoidable as a major element of peoples thinking and group behaviour, I think it is inevitable and ultimately good that societies seeking and working towards anything that might be called perfection would be particularist and exclusivist. I think this can be demonstrated with certain statistics. The period of time it is estimated to take for the human races to have thoroughly mixed is 6000 years. This is roughly equal to the period of time in which human civilization is known to have existed. In that time, how many people are going to minorities? How many people are going to live within value systems that differ from their own? Countless, thereby there is simply no end to the progressive social science movement. No end close enough in sight for it to be worth considering, unless it related to something like the destruction of the earth.
One of the points I am making here is that race has persistently meant more than economic or political ideology. It is a kind of lowest common denominator that is easily used to manipulate people and it easily carries value systems, more easily than nations or religions do, as far as I can tell. I think the narrative that the world was colour blind until some point in the late 1700s or early 1800s when the British invented racism is pretty inane really. It seems that it was more flexible whether the race or the religion was the most important matter before that time, but I suspect that will have been due to the tiny proportion of ethnic minorities living in most populations then. The ideas of people like Bertrand Russel, that a world state is an inevitable and positive thing may have merit in some ways, but the fact remains that we failed to create what may be termed a plain people, or a people without identity, in any number. This is despite various policies, in some countries including legally mandated miscegenation. Also, consider the present level of importance afforded to individual liberty and also levels of cultural relativism and group rights by the ideology of the most powerful nations and international institutions. It strikes me that this goes counter to the possibility of mankind slowly being socialized into a singular identity and value system.
I strongly believe that the present society we have in the United Kingdom is sick. It is broken. The same affliction affects many other countries throughout the West. This affliction is a man-made illness, it is the result of a long term poisoning of our value system. To speak in such generalities and with such colourful language may elicit disdain in many, but I do so with honesty and because I think it accurately describes the situation.
What is society? What is a country? What is the West? Too often, questions like this are left deliberately unanswered. The question itself is the answer; it is the vial of bad medicine from the witchdoctor. How could any value you might hold be correct, how can we make such an assumption, we must sustain an artificial sense of wonder that leaves us incapable of making judgements and then accept dire situations without rational responses, having had our honour broken by this false consciousness. I say that the fundamental particle of society is the value. To hold that it can be broken down further is flawed science. Why do these values exist? There is a direct and obvious answer to that question. We work in partnership, we work based on trust. When we go to the office and ask Bill to make the usual cup of tea, while opening up excel, there is no fear in our mind that that tea may be poisoned. If there were such a fear, our ability to operate efficiently would deteriorate massively. If we thought we might be held up and robbed at any moment we may eventually be less focused on the accumulation of wealth. We care more about the lives of our relatives than whether they dishonor us.
