It always amazes me how everyone on this planet seems to see, hear, feel and remember differently from each other. But that is what makes life so interesting, isn't it? I mean a coin would be pretty boring if both sides were the same.
What is reality? Your perception of what you think is reality or your perception plus a 3rd party perspective to agree that it's reality? The line is some what blurred sometimes.
My opinion: Tug is the best sounding record I've ever done. Why? It was recorded at 24bit/48k resolution. I used better equipment to record the instrumentation. Tom also upgraded his studio, using the best A/D to D/A converters made. We spent more time mixing than ever before as well. End result: The best sonically sounding Enchant album to date. But that's just my opinion, it can't be reality with out 3rd party perspective. Well, I got 3rd party perspective. Everyone who I've personally talked to has said exactly the same thing to me, with out me even asking. Interviewers, Reviewers, Record Company, Distributer, Promoters, DJ's, Masterer, Mixer, Band and now the Fans say..."It's the best sounding Enchant album to date!" That says to me that it is just that. Kind of like the 4 out of 5 Dentist thing, only 999 out of 1000 Enchant fans agree, in this case.
I think the question I have for you is, What is it that made you dislike this record so much, that you've spent this much energy to make sure everyone knows how you feel about it? I really didn't care for the last Rush album much but I didn't go to thier web site and try to convince
ther fans that it sucked. I mean that's like telling a groom on his wedding day that you think his wife is ugly! Expect to get your ass kicked or at least hear some colorful metephores.
I'm sure you could do something more positive with your time than knocking my work.
BTW- Break and Juggling were recorded exclusively with a Line 6 guitar amp. I started using my Mesa Boogie rig on Blink again and Tug as well.
So, if you don't like the record, no big deal...there is no accounting for taste. I just try and do the best I can with what little budget I have, if it's not good enough for you...don't listen anymore.
Doug
Taedium Vitae said:
I know no repeated listenings will do the trick. I've listened to this album maybe 10-12 times really TRYING to like it, but no go. I usually like albums right away anyway, and I would like to say I'm not a close-minded person when it comes to music. Heck, I can (and often do) enjoy what some people might call "noise". Avant-garde and electro-acoustic music for example. But I don't cry myself to sleep over it. I'll just keep on listening to the previous albums and hope the next one will suit my tastes. And if it doesn't? Oh well, it's not the end of the world... and it's not an unusual phaenomenon really. I'm used to it.
Regarding the production issue. "In what Tug songs, does the production fall short????" you ask. Well, as the production is even across the whole album I have to say every single song. I think the mix is unbalanced. Some odd stereo separation. Bass is too floaty and lacks clarity/punch. Only starts to getting noticed in the tapping parts. Guitar sound is, whilst better than BoaE (which is horrible in that regard -- sounds incredibly digital and "waspy"), a bit lacking, but solo tone is OK. Drum mix isn't that bad, though I think the cymbals lack shimmer. Toms are recessed. Keys are OK, but some patches are a tad annoying (the semi-outro solo on the title track for example). All over it sounds very tinny and...distant. "Dusty". Impersonal. Hmmm. I'm not good at describing sound like this.
And well, it's in many regards better than the Blueprint yes, of course. I mean that was their first album, recorded in the "glorious" early 90s. Not many non-jazz albums recorded then with good sound. I didn't compare to Blueprint anyway (for these reasons), just Break and J9D10, which IMO are the best ones in terms of production.
I mean, you can get very well-sounding (pro) recordings out of semi-budget digital gear + a computer nowadays, as long as you know what you're doing. It's actually amazing what you can accomplish with that stuff now.
But then again, it's just sugar on the cake. I have lots of albums with terrible production I just can't stop listening to; the music is what matters. I just find it very hard to understand someone thinking ToW sounds better than Break or J9D10. It's mind-boggling to me, but I'm probably just screwed up in the head. So ignore me.
Anyway, am I making myself clear? Have I given you enough "proof"? (Strange concept you've got there though...proof... ah well, it doesn't matter.)