Males and Females

MetalAges said:
Well, generally there aren't TOO many of those kind of covers. If someone is posting a "Now playing" and it happens to be a cover like that, it is what it is. I would cringe though if it were a sig image and appeared a gabillion times in various threads etc. though. Make sense?
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Just a curiosity thing anyway. But yeah, I was wondering more about those images of autopsies and accidents with a band name and album title stuck on them. The music attached to that kind of stuff is almost always garbage anyways, and I don't have a problem with those types of music in general. (Maybe dead infection is an exception)
 
Krow said:
Fair enough. Just a curiosity thing anyway. But yeah, I was wondering more about those images of autopsies and accidents with a band name and album title stuck on them. The music attached to that kind of stuff is almost always garbage anyways, and I don't have a problem with those types of music in general. (Maybe dead infection is an exception)
Click to expand...

I like Surgical Disembowelment a lot, but that's about everything I need by them.
 
My bad Zeph, I didn't mean to ignore you. When you said it shouldn't be on a site like this I thought you were being sarcastic because... well, album covers and necrophilia jokes and general sexuality and brutality. Plus I was not aware you were admin. And Metal we talked.

Guess I know where the line is now. Bro-bot will have to chill without his girlfriend in my sig.

Edit: I also went back and removed the link to the rest of the pictures from that unfortunate, ghoulish scenario. I'm sure nobody else was interested in seeing them anyways. Nekro, you should probably edit out your quote of me.
 
Hold your horses. Posting links to a site like that I believe is OK, since the guideline is not for the images to be directly viewable on any page of this site.
 
MetalAges said:
I removed, and sent a private message explaining things.

General rule of thumb, if it is something that would make someone hide their screen at work or go green in the face if they have a kiddo next to them while looking at UM - it probably shouldn't be there.

I should add a slightly funny story also. You know years ago when I took over the site (10 years now!) I got allllll kinds of shit from tons of the early/mid/late teenagers yapping about censorship, I was overlording, etc. I would always have to explain myself, tell them how in a few years when they matured more they'd be sorry for posting stuff like that etc. (Carpe this is related, but I am not directing at you).

To this day, I kid you not, a large chunk of those pain in the ass users ( I say that lovingly) contact me asking for their posts to be deleted, info removed, etc. etc.

Why yes, I do take that as an opportunity to bust their balls! :)
Click to expand...

Haha, I remember some of that fuss. I can't believe I've been on this site so long.
 
Zephyrus said:
Hold your horses. Posting links to a site like that I believe is OK, since the guideline is not for the images to be directly viewable on any page of this site.
Click to expand...

I will keep that in mind next time I feel compelled to share things!
 
Wait one fucking second...

Butt dates a 16 year old?

1) I know someone that's gone to jail for an "inappropriate relationship with a minor" - is it different where you live or are you just weird like that?

2) All this time you've been talking about "baggin' me a fine lass"...it's been you bragging about gettin' your dick wet thanks to preying on high school kids?

Srsly bro wtf.
 
He claimed to me that he was 23...I definitely doubted it but he was persistent...maybe he was lying to me all those times, yeah. That would make a LOT more sense.
 
romanticism said:
He claimed to me that he was 23...I definitely doubted it but he was persistent...maybe he was lying to me all those times, yeah. That would make a LOT more sense.
Click to expand...

I thought he was 20, which is borderline. If he's 23 he's a straight creeper. 16 year olds are children. I don't see how any grown adult could be in a "relationship" with a child and have any self respect left.
 
I guess what I am trying to get at is not everyone is a 40 year old pervert who preys on young girls. Not everything is physical attraction and their is factors when it comes to two people dating.
 
Master_Yoda77 said:
He's definitely 23 and she is definitely over 16. Pretty sure she's about 19. Me and Ronnie chat on the AIDSbook often about slam pieces.
Click to expand...

Oh, well 23 and 19 isn't a big deal.

Death Delirium said:
I guess what I am trying to get at is not everyone is a 40 year old pervert who preys on young girls. Not everything is physical attraction and their is factors when it comes to two people dating.
Click to expand...

OK. But if a 23 year old man is dating a 16 year old girl and the primary reason isn't that he wants to fuck and manipulate a child, like if he's actually romantically enraptured with a 16 year old girl, then he is extremely immature. Even the most intellectually advanced 16 year olds are still emotionally 16 year olds. A grown man (or a woman) could find that be a compatible romantic partner can only find that attractive if he or she is emotionally underdeveloped.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lasse Lammert
humans are sick!!
Replies
32
Views
2K
Bar
Mancha
M
Krilons Resa
Sex Dictionary
Replies
7
Views
864
RC
Ayeka
A
VEHEMENCE
Everything you need to know about making sex fun. (shared with loved ones)
Replies
4
Views
858
Vehemence
satanicnugz
S
Dustin
UPDATE: The death and ressurection of Katagory V?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Katagory V
drum_addict_48
D
Executioner213
Is it wrong of me?
Replies
17
Views
1K
Bar
Executioner213
E
Top Bottom