Males and Females

Jason Mamoa is totally smoking. Complete doucher though, he was talking in an interview about making his own GOT spinoff series where Khal Drogo never died.

Speaking of Samoans... Dwayne Johnson aka The Rock. Maybe its a chick thing but mmmmmmm on them hulking motherfuckers. I like a strong measure of intimidation.
 
I think I'm a minority in the sense that I rather just black or white as oppose to the mixed look on most occasions. Though I think the "mix" look is attractive and see why others are attracted to it, it's rare that I am attracted to it on a guy and normally just prefer like either black or white or asian etc. And with that Jason Moma is attractive but not what I'd go for.

On a totally unrelated note, realllllly extremellllly dark skin girls (like that blue black dark) make my blood BOIL. This is probably my own personal preference though as people would not agree on here, but I've been lurking this girl's fan page on Facebook for a good 45 minutes drooling at her pictures.

1374070_10151993703708420_1380562089_n.jpg
 
I can see black women as objectively pretty but they don't do anything for me as far as sexual attraction goes. I've gone through this awkward dilemma before with a (now) friend of mine.
 
One of my biggest college regrets was not taking an uber-dark, ass-well-endowed, African-born lab partner up on her offer to taking me dancing. I got to enjoy a great many angerfaps of her attempting to embarrass me for being a virgin, but still.
 
Had a coffee date today with a Harvard student. She was cute and we had a great conversation, but I couldn't fully get into it because I have a date tomorrow with a girl that I've been chatting with constantly and think is really cool. She gets almost all my obscure references, started reading the Malazan Book of the Fallen with minimal prompting, and hasn't been creeped out by awkward sexual innuendo or my repeatedly drunkenly texting her death metal lyrics in all caps. Pretty excited, getting drinks with her tomorrow.
 
So I've been thinking about what dating actually is when it's stripped down to its primal core. Firstly, if women were as easily aroused as men, monogamy would completely disappear, the word "pervert" would cease to have an entry in the dictionary, and there would be a whole lot of free fucking. I guess that kind of goes without saying, but it leads into my next point. Since women do not have an insatiable sex drive like men, they require a little extra by way of being treated like princesses. Men are willing to put forth the effort for a consistent lay. Yadayada "emotional" connection, whatever. I have an emotional connection with my parents but I don't want to bang them.

It's just another over-hyped euphemism to make people think there's something "spiritually" significant about monogamy. There isn't. It's the end result of a mating call and a way to deny the fact that there will always be the threat of someone else.

I've always felt the same way about "making love." Nobody can confidently describe what that is. Slow and gentle fucking is still fucking. It's still primal hedonism that has nothing to do with intimacy. Sure, it's awesome but I'm sick of people trying to mask it to be something more deep and meaningful than it is. It's just an attempt to bypass the fact that it's raunchy, fun, and "sinful" shit you do with your bodies. There's nothing wrong with admitting that it's all fucking at the end of the day.

And yeah, I know I "just don't get it" because I don't. Exclusivity in relationships comes with all sorts of disasters that I shouldn't have to mention here, which makes me wonder why people persistently chase this overly-sentimental "requirement" for happiness. Time to move on people! You can't get away with cheating in the cell phone/internet age.
 
Exclusivity in relationships comes with all sorts of disasters that I shouldn't have to mention here, which makes me wonder why people persistently chase this overly-sentimental "requirement" for happiness.

It's for the children. Literally. As in, you can't all just be free-fucking bonobos and also take good care of children. Of course, if you don't want kids, then by all means go bonofuckingbo. Just be sure to use protection so as to erase yourself from the gene pool and not fuck over some poor kid unfortunate enough to be your accidental offspring.
 
It's for the children. Literally. As in, you can't all just be free-fucking bonobos and also take good care of children. Of course, if you don't want kids, then by all means go bonofuckingbo. Just be sure to use protection so as to erase yourself from the gene pool and not fuck over some poor kid unfortunate enough to be your accidental offspring.

I didn't even say anything about me personally since I've never been all that promiscuous. I'm just looking at it realistically in that monogamy is centered around controlling your partner. Polyamory seems the most ideal to me if you thrive on relationships since it allows you to accept that relationships are temporary and is a way of combatting jealousy by always keeping your options open. Hardly a "solution" but it seems the most pragmatic to me.

Personally, I have no interest in a relationship of any kind. Jealousy is the stupidest thing to get pissed off about. It's been so long since I've been in a position to be severely jealous but I remember it sucking ass, and for no fucking reason! Who is honestly so naive that they believe that their partner is not going to get bored at some point and want to fuck someone else? Why does something that nobody can help piss me off so much? My girlfriend is fucking someone else. Boohoo. It's not like she's out killing babies or something. If I don't like it, I always have the option of BEING SINGLE. *gasp*. It's a pointless thing to worry about that EVERYONE dwells on. The way I deal with it these days is by not dealing with it. I'm in a domestic partnership with my music collection and she's faithful enough for me.

Oh, and the responsibilty of having a kid doesn't change in polyamory and I don't see why it would. Parents don't have to be together to raise a kid.
 
My personal view of monogamy anthropologically is that it's an institution designed to maximize the frequency of having sex. Even if we drop all pretenses that romantic partnerships serve any other purpose than physical gratification, the monogamous relationship will still be practiced for that very reason, the guarantee of having sex most frequently. It's simply the most efficient means to an end.
 
Oh, and the responsibilty of having a kid doesn't change in polyamory and I don't see why it would. Parents don't have to be together to raise a kid.

Raise vs raise well.

My personal view of monogamy anthropologically is that it's an institution designed to maximize the frequency of having sex. Even if we drop all pretenses that romantic partnerships serve no other purpose than physical gratification, the monogamous relationship will still be practiced for that very reason, the guarantee of having sex most frequently. It's simply the most efficient means to an end.

I don't know if that could be considered the/a telos, but it is certainly a byproduct at the very least.