Metaltastic
Member
- Feb 20, 2005
- 19,930
- 1
- 36
Nah, they're often labeled 280w - and yeah, Black Shadows are actually based on the Celestion CL80, a very different (and inferior IMO) sounding speaker than the V30
Nah, they're often labeled 280w
no. WRONG.
Mesa labels all of their speakers with the Black Shadow label. I thought the v30s too, but I guess that is the only exception.
They changed the speakers whenever they stopped producing the v30's in England or something like that. Supposedly they were 70w, then changed to 60w.
But this says it was a misprint.. Post 3 & 4: http://forum.grailtone.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=35987
MC90's dont sound like V30's thats just fact. However im sure there is something going on with this "Black Shadow" shizzle, when I researched my last cab I saw people saying Mesa called all the early speakers they had "Black Shadows" but these days the Black Shadow now refers to the MC90.
Nope, other way around - Marshall V30's are darker, Mesa V30's are brighter. Both also have a 70w power handling, while the 'standard' V30 is only 60W.
This comment actually dosen't apply to lolzgreg's clips because
they are both well produced but my point is that I think that there
was no need to use the same mic position or amp settings when
comparing two Cab's.
I think there is a bit of a problem with A/B tests, not because of the test itself but how people interpret them.
I could set my amp up with really scooped mids and A/B through a mediocre mid heavy cab (A) and a really nice scooped sounding cab (B), everyone would go "oh i like A better, i always thought B was far too scooped sounding" when actually anything you do with A sucks ASS compared to B with an appropriately set up amp
any chance of reposting the originals clips? Would love to hear the mesa vs mills comparison. thanks!