NFL 2009

[muzmaze]

GB just scored and recovered an onside kick and scored again...so hold on! We need a good close game for christ sakes!

As far as the Pats...def not thier year. They didn't want to tie-up money and overpay for certain vet D-men understandably...yet they ended up missing such players (Seymore, Vrabel, Harrison) performance, leadership etc. Kinda a rebuilding year on D. They need to draft the best pass rusher in the draft, period! The offense had the talent but overall underplayed bigtime!

 

[MasterOLightning]

Kurt Warner is the shit. For how much GB seems to have roared back, they're just where they were at halftime.

 

[Krow]

So far I'm 3-0 for the teams I wanted to win, (not necessarily thought they would) winning... if the pack go down, it'll be 4-0.

The bengals bungled... no surprise... the cowboys and ravens... I thought would have a tougher time but rolled...


At this point, as long as the Vikings dont win it, I could care less who wins the superbowl...

 

[muzmaze]

Kurt Warner is the shit.

Yeah, Kudos to the old man Warner.

So far I'm 3-0

Unless you are nutting up some $'s on these games...we don't care!

 

[Krow]

10 per game among a couple friends, so as a matter of fact, I am making out.

 

[muzmaze]

just bustin...
there ya go...good for you!

 

[MasterOLightning]

I don't trust Rackers. We'll see.

 

[MasterOLightning]

Not every team can have Robbie Gould I suppose. The one position the Bears don't need to improve at.

 

[muzmaze]

I don't trust Rackers. We'll see.

he pulled that one like a sailor in a whore house!

 

[Xorv]

CARDINALS WIN!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[The Ozzman]

That overtime scoring rule sucks and should be changed

 

[Krow]

lol @ Rodgers kicking the ball into the defenders arms, no way he runs that in if he didnt, at least.

 

[muzmaze]

That overtime scoring rule sucks and should be changed

I agree...if you mean both teams earn and should atleast have one possession. Ironically, the team that won, never touched the ball on offense...go figure?
wait...R U being sarcastic...probably?

 

[Mort Divine]

god what a bullshit end of the game. there were so many fucked up (non)calls near the end that were just plain wrong or missed.

Helmet to helmet non-call, roughing the passer being called instead of offensive holding(? wtf), non-call on a facemask, etc.

 

[AchrisK]

I agree...if you mean both teams earn and should atleast have one possession. Ironically, the team that won, never touched the ball on offense...go figure?
...

Good point!

I am also open to them changing the rules.

 

[The Ozzman]

I agree...if you mean both teams earn and should atleast have one possession. Ironically, the team that won, never touched the ball on offense...go figure?
wait...R U being sarcastic...probably?

Both teams should have at least one possession each instead of sudden death

 

[AchrisK]

Baltimore Ravens @ Indianapolis Colts
New York Jets @ San Diego Chargers

Dallas Cowboys @ Minnesota Vikings
Arizona Cardinals @ New Orleans Saints

 

[muzmaze]

Both teams should have at least one possession each instead of sudden death

Sure, of course...I've been saying this for a while now. Do it like the NCAA. If they don't want it exactly like the NCAA...then have kickoffs. If a team scores then they also have to kickoff and defend. If niether score on an ensuing kickoff, then start possessions and go like the NCAA does it. Maybe too much to ask for?

lol @ Rodgers kicking the ball into the defenders arms, no way he runs that in if he didnt, at least.

ur exactly right. If you look at the replay...if Rogers foot doesn't swing up and kick the ball...no way the Card defender is able to get under it, catch and return it. Funny, Rackers missed kick almost loses it for Cards...yet Rogers kick kinda wins it for the Cards.

 

[MasterOLightning]

There were some not-so-good calls in the last game (roughing the passer [facemask] should have been neutralized by offensive pass interference on Fitzgerald's second TD), but Green Bay was holding on just about every single pass play, so....

OT rules should be changed to give each offense a chance, but in this case GB had a chance, so I can't see how this instance would make one complain about OT. If anything, today's result supports the current rule. Just because a game is a shootout doesn't mean that the first team with the ball will win.

 

[Krow]

Fitzgerald steamrolling Woodson made me laugh. He sure as hell wont make you fumble if you do that to him before you catch the ball.