I will give you a synopsis as to why I have beef with the current solutions.
For starters when you have a DI box in parallel with the load (even if it is a cab or reactive loadbox) is that the DI is lowering the load and its transformer adds additional inductances/inductance votlages which on paper are minute enough to not be an issue, but it is not ideal. The next big thing is that DI's where originally designed for live use and therefor where intended to go into a mic preamp. This is fine live, but for reamping guitars in a studio this has a whole list of problems. First, the DI transformer has a stepdown ratio that matches that of a mic level, and thus has to be amplified by a preamp. Any amplification causes noise. To top it off, with a mic preamp, you need it to be linear as possible. Hyper-Linear preamps are not abundant nor cheap.
My solution was to make a loadbox that had a lineout instead, completely bypassing the need for a preamp. But I took it a step further, I made sure that all sensitive components where separated from each other by using buffers. This means that we have maximum input impedance to not effect the load on the amp and minimal output impedance as to have the capability to deliver as much current to the A/D Converters as they desire to draw, without effecting the amp, without causing distortion (THD). Not only that, but we have eliminated the need for a DI Box and a Mic Preamp. The load and the "Pseudo-DI" are an all-in-one solution and is much cheaper than buying all of the traditional components. To top it all off I added the speaker distortion simulator which mimics the way a speaker reacts to its assembly. What you get is one box that loads your amp, and provides you with an ultra-linear line level output.
I cannot say that it will improve performance over the Tonehound -> Type 85 -> Pre setup as I have never used that setup and cannot comment it, but I can say that my product will do the same thing for a much cheaper price.